Congress recently passed—and the President signed into law—the SECURE Act, landmark legislation that may affect how you plan for your retirement. Many of the provisions go into effect in 2020, which means now is the time to consider how these new rules may affect your tax and retirement-planning situation.

Congress recently passed—and the President signed into law—the SECURE Act, landmark legislation that may affect how you plan for your retirement. Many of the provisions go into effect in 2020, which means now is the time to consider how these new rules may affect your tax and retirement-planning situation.

Here is a look at some of the more important elements of the SECURE Act that have an impact on individuals. The changes in the law might provide you and your family with tax-savings opportunities. However, not all of the changes are favorable, and there may be steps you could take to minimize their impact. Please give me a call if you would like to discuss these matters.

Sincerely,

Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE Act)

Key provisions affecting individuals:

Repeal of the maximum age for traditional IRA contributions.

Before 2020, traditional IRA contributions were not allowed once the individual attained age 70½. Starting in 2020, the new rules allow an individual of any age to make contributions to a traditional IRA, as long as the individual has compensation, which generally means earned income from wages or self-employment.

Required minimum distribution age raised from 70½ to 72.

Before 2020, retirement plan participants and IRA owners were generally required to begin taking required minimum distributions, or RMDs, from their plan by April 1 of the year following the year they reached age 70½. The age 70½ requirement was first applied in the retirement plan context in the early 1960s and, until recently, had not been adjusted to account for increases in life expectancy.

For distributions required to be made after Dec. 31, 2019, for individuals who attain age 70½ after that date, the age at which individuals must begin taking distributions from their retirement plan or IRA is increased from 70½ to 72.

Partial elimination of stretch IRAs.

For deaths of plan participants or IRA owners occurring before 2020, beneficiaries (both spousal and nonspousal) were generally allowed to stretch out the tax-deferral advantages of the plan or IRA by taking distributions over the beneficiary s life or life expectancy (in the IRA context, this is sometimes referred to as a “stretch IRA”).

However, for deaths of plan participants or IRA owners beginning in 2020 (later for some participants in collectively bargained plans and governmental plans), distributions to most nonspouse beneficiaries are generally required to be distributed within ten years following the plan participant s or IRA owner s death. So, for those beneficiaries, the “stretching” strategy is no longer allowed.

Exceptions to the 10-year rule are allowed for distributions to (1) the surviving spouse of the plan participant or IRA owner; (2) a child of the plan participant or IRA owner who has not reached majority; (3) a chronically ill individual; and (4) any other individual who is not more than ten years younger than the plan participant or IRA owner. Those beneficiaries who qualify under this exception may generally still take their distributions over their life expectancy (as allowed under the rules in effect for deaths occurring before 2020).

Expansion of Section 529 education savings plans to cover registered apprenticeships and distributions to repay certain student loans.

A Section 529 education savings plan (a 529 plan, also known as a qualified tuition program) is a tax-exempt program established and maintained by a state, or one or more eligible educational institutions (public or private). Any person can make nondeductible cash contributions to a 529 plan on behalf of a designated beneficiary. The earnings on the contributions accumulate tax-free. Distributions from a 529 plan are excludable up to the amount of the designated beneficiary's qualified higher education expenses.

Before 2019, qualified higher education expenses didn't include the expenses of registered apprenticeships or student loan repayments.

But for distributions made after Dec. 31, 2018 (the effective date is retroactive), tax-free distributions from 529 plans can be used to pay for fees, books, supplies, and equipment required for the designated beneficiary s participation in an apprenticeship program. In addition, tax-free distributions (up to $10,000) are allowed to pay the principal or interest on a qualified education loan of the designated beneficiary, or a sibling of the designated beneficiary.

Kiddie tax changes for gold star children and others.

In 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA, P.L. 115-97), which made changes to the so-called “kiddie tax,” which is a tax on the unearned income of certain children. Before enactment of the TCJA, the net unearned income of a child was taxed at the parents' tax rates if the parents' tax rates were higher than the tax rates of the child.

Under the TCJA, for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, the taxable income of a child attributable to net unearned income is taxed according to the brackets applicable to trusts and estates. Children to whom the kiddie tax rules apply and who have net unearned income also have a reduced exemption amount under the alternative minimum tax (AMT) rules.

There had been concern that the TCJA changes unfairly increased the tax on certain children, including those who were receiving government payments (i.e., unearned income) because they were survivors of deceased military personnel (“gold star children”), first responders, and emergency medical workers.

The new rules enacted on Dec. 20, 2019, repeal the kiddie tax measures that were added by the TCJA. So, starting in 2020 (with the option to start retroactively in 2018 and/or 2019), the unearned income of children is taxed under the pre-TCJA rules, and not at trust/estate rates. And starting retroactively in 2018, the new rules also eliminate the reduced AMT exemption amount for children to whom the kiddie tax rules apply and who have net unearned income.

Penalty-free retirement plan withdrawals for expenses related to the birth or adoption of a child.

Generally, a distribution from a retirement plan must be included in income. And, unless an exception applies (for example, distributions in case of financial hardship), a distribution before the age of 59-1/2 is subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty on the amount includible in income.

Starting in 2020, plan distributions (up to $5,000) that are used to pay for expenses related to the birth or adoption of a child are penalty-free. That $5,000 amount applies on an individual basis, so for a married couple, each spouse may receive a penalty-free distribution up to $5,000 for a qualified birth or adoption.

Taxable non-tuition fellowship and stipend payments are treated as compensation for IRA purposes.

Before 2020, stipends and non-tuition fellowship payments received by graduate and postdoctoral students were not treated as compensation for IRA contribution purposes, and so could not be used as the basis for making IRA contributions.

Starting in 2020, the new rules remove that obstacle by permitting taxable non-tuition fellowship and stipend payments to be treated as compensation for IRA contribution purposes. This change will enable these students to begin saving for retirement without delay.

Tax-exempt difficulty-of-care payments are treated as compensation for determining retirement contribution limits.

Many home healthcare workers do not have taxable income because their only compensation comes from “difficulty-of-care” payments that are exempt from taxation. Because those workers do not have taxable income, they were not able to save for retirement in a qualified retirement plan or IRA.

For IRA contributions made after Dec. 20, 2019 (and retroactively starting in 2016 for contributions made to certain qualified retirement plans), the new rules allow home healthcare workers to contribute to a retirement plan or IRA by providing that tax-exempt difficulty-of-care payments are treated as compensation for purposes of calculating the contribution limits to certain qualified plans and IRAs.

Reference: Thomson Reuters\Checkpoint

Avoid the Surprise!  In the world of Income tax, 2018 and 2019 saw many changes as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that was passed in 2017.  To that end, what follows in this memo is a highlight of the most relevant changes and some recurring “standard” advice around which meaningful year-end planning can occur.

December 2019 Tax Planning Letter

Clients & Friends:

Yes it is that time again. Black Friday sales way before "Black Friday", holiday décor at stores, holiday songs redone for political correctness, holiday party invites and the time for some TAX PLANNING AND YEAR END FINANCIAL REVIEWS. 

Our purpose in this communication is to encourage you to give a little attention to your tax and economic situations. Action taken after New Year's Eve may be too late to impact 2019. 

The 2017 tax reform, which mostly became effective for 2018 tax return filing, gave us some new perspectives on tax filings and the related planning. We are sure a lot of you were surprised when your 2018 individual returns reflected the new increased standard deduction amounts rather than the itemized deductions to which we had all become accustomed. For 2019, those standard deduction amounts are $12,200 for single filers, $18,350 for head of household status and $24,400 for married joint filers. If you are over 65, the standard amounts are increased by $1,650 in the single or head of household status and by $1,300 per person over 65 on a joint return (e.g. the standard deduction for a joint return with both over age 65 is $27,000). 

With the increased standard deduction in place, it gives you the opportunity/incentive to time and manage your deductions including mostly "elective" medical expenses (starting in 2019 medical expenses must exceed 10% of your adjusted gross income (AGI) to be deductible) and charitable contributions. A popular strategy is to bunch these deductions every other year and take advantage of the high standard deductions in the intervening years. A way to "manage" your charitable contributions is to use a donor advised fund (DAF) to make and deduct a large contribution amount in 2019 and pay amounts to your favorite charities in succeeding years from the fund. If the DAF strategy is cumbersome or will not work for you, make two years' worth of donations in 2019 and skip the payments to the charities of your choice in 2020. 

If your itemized deductions still will not meet the standard deduction amount and you are over 70½, consider sending your required minimum distribution (RMD) amount from your IRA account directly to the charity of your choice. You will not have to pay tax on the distribution and "in effect" get the qualified charitable deduction for the payment. This contribution distribution is limited to payments of $100,000 or less. 

Remember, itemized deductions from tax reform limited the TOTAL amount of all personal tax deductions (income and real estate tax) to $10,000, so there is very limited tax planning available in this area and usually no benefit in accelerating the final state estimated tax payments due 1/15/2020. 

Mortgage rates are favorable again. If you are purchasing a home or considering refinancing, remember the new mortgage limit for tax deduction is $750,000. You can, however, refi your old mortgage and apply the $1M limit as long as you do not receive "proceeds" from the refi. 

Last year at this time we warned of surprises because of changes in the federal income tax withholding tables that occurred early in 2018 and left many taxpayers short on their 2018 tax returns. If you were one that owed tax with the 2018 federal return because of this AND did not adjust your tax withholding in 2019, we encourage you to revisit the withholding NOW to avoid or at least be prepared for that unpleasant conversation with us in early 2020 about tax due. We will be happy to assist you in this assessment if needed. We dislike these surprise moments as much as you do! 

A few other tax adjustments we became more knowledgeable and familiar with in the 2018 returns include the new Qualified Business Income (or QBI) deduction under Sec. 199(A) which resulted in a deduction from your taxable income of 20% of your QBI. This deduction which is subject to various complex limitations was beneficial to many with business income on schedule "C" or business income passed through from partnerships or "S" corporations. We also dealt with limitations on business interest deductions under new section 163(j) and the overall limitations on business losses. These changes among others made for a challenging filing season! 

We are a bit "thankful" at this time that Congress has other "issues" to consider and it appears that no further tax "simplification" will occur in 2019! 

As of this writing, the stock market is on a bit of a roll. That means this is a good time to review your portfolio and balance any 2019 gains by selling positions that will result in capital losses. Remember when considering the 2019 gains to factor-in any capital gain distributions from mutual funds that will be reported to you and taxable in 2019. Most mutual funds will post on their websites the approximate amounts of capital gain distributions late in November or early December. 

Recent tax law allows for tax on certain qualified long-term gains to be deferred if they are reinvested in a qualified opportunity fund. If you have significant gains and are interested in this concept, please contact us. 

Do not be reluctant to realize net capital losses in 2019. The losses will offset 2019 gains including mutual fund distributions and the balance can be carried over to offset gains in 2020 and succeeding years! You may also find that 2019 is not a bad year to realize capital gains. Again the market is at an all-time high and you know the maximum capital gain rate is 20% or 23.8% if the net investment income tax applies. One should never feel bad about taking some gains off the table! As always in this area, be sure the economic considerations in any decision outweigh the possible tax benefits or costs. 

While we are talking of your portfolio and if you are charitably inclined, or want to fund the DAF mentioned earlier, giving appreciated securities to a charity is a very effective method of donation. You get a full fair market value deduction for the donated stock or fund held over one year, and do not pay capital gain tax on the gain in the position. 

If you are making gifts to family members it may also be efficient to give long-term appreciated positions. It is possible the donee could sell the stock or fund and take advantage of the ZERO% tax rate on the gain. That rate exists if taxable income is below $39,385 for singles and $52,750 and $78,750 for head of household or joint filers, respectively. If the donee is under age 24, Kiddie tax rules could impact the tax calculation. One last note here, if you have loser positions, DO NOT give them away. Sell the position and take the loss on your return where it is probably more valuable. 

If for some reason you find yourself in a low income tax bracket in 2019 AND have funds in an IRA account, one option to consider is converting all or a portion of that account to a ROTH IRA to take advantage of a low rate in 2019. The future distributions from the ROTH will not be subject to tax as long as it is in place for 5 years. 

While this letter is aimed primarily at our individual filers, those who have or own business entities should consider taking advantage of the very generous depreciation tax breaks and Section 179 deductions for the purchase of equipment and other business property. Some of these deduction limits decrease or phase-out in the future. As a result, investing now may be a wise choice. 

Also consider implementing or enhancing your retirement plans. For example, a solo 401(k) is a particularly popular plan design for a sole proprietor with no employees to take advantage of higher deduction limits. 

This is also a good time to review the designated beneficiaries on your retirement plans and life insurance policies as well as who you may have named as an executor of your will, power of attorney or trustee. Changes due to death or divorce sometimes occur in our lives and these designations go unchanged. These are relatively easy to change when you are in charge and often very difficult or impossible to alter after a disability or death. 

The year end is also a good time to revisit your estate planning and the related documents. Consider taking advantage NOW of the annual gift tax exclusion which is $15,000 per year per donee. As an example, dad and mom can gift as much as $60,000 to son and spouse by December 31 with no gift tax issue or filing requirement. These annual exclusion gifts DO NOT reduce your current lifetime gift/estate tax exemption of $11.4 million for each spouse and is portable. A married couple NOW enjoys a total exclusion of $22.8 million. With these exclusions in place we are not filing very many "taxable" gift or estate tax returns at this time. It is important to remember that these enhanced exclusion amounts are scheduled to sunset in 2026. While that may or may not happen, you may want to take advantage while we know they are available. 

Please keep our firm in mind as you gather with friends and family over the next few months. Our best referrals often come from existing clients who are able to speak highly on our behalf. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to do business with new individuals and businesses each year. 

Reminder: our firm continues to be very involved in estate administration including the preparation and filing of PA Inheritance tax returns and federal estate and gift tax returns. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you unfortunately have a need in these areas. 

One Final Reminder: do not hesitate to contact us to discuss and/or help implement any tax or economic planning or any other matter if you feel we can be of assistance. We are a more valuable asset to you when we have the opportunity in advance to consider and comment on the economic transactions which impact your tax matters. 

Finally, we hope you have a joyous and peaceful Holiday Season and find plentiful reasons to give thanks for 2019 and wish you all the best for a Happy and Healthy 2020!!! 

Thank you for being our clients and friends and allowing our firm to provide your tax and accounting needs. 

Siana Carr O'Connor & Lynam, LLP

Please read about the various changes in payroll withholding and related tax filing requirments for 2020.

The following is a summary of the various changes in payroll withholding and related filing requirements for 2020. As always, if you have any questions on these matters please contact us.

 The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), passed in December 2017, impacted individuals through the introduction of new tax rates and brackets, increased standard deduction, changes to allowable itemized deductions, elimination of personal exemptions, among many other changes.

 Under TCJA, various deductions and certain tax-favored fringe benefits were eliminated or modified. These changes included the suspension of the deductions for moving expenses and certain qualified transportation expenses. The tax-free reimbursement of employment-related moving expenses was suspended. The Act also suspended an employee's deduction for unreimbursed business expenses (previously deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction).

 The Act reduced the federal corporate (C-Corp) tax rate to 21%, while also providing a new deduction from pass-through income generated by most S-Corps, Partnerships, Sole Proprietors, etc. These provisions have many business owners reconsidering their current entity structure and evaluating the methods for paying themselves and their employees. Please note that the issues of reasonable compensation to owners, and the classification of workers as employees vs. independent contractors remain the focus of Internal Revenue Service scrutiny. Numerous other provisions exist which may impact your employees, you and/or your business, but a more in-depth analysis of the complete Act is beyond the scope of this newsletter focusing on employment taxes. Please contact our office should you desire a more in-depth explanation of this legislation.

 FEDERAL TAX DEPOSITS

 Most taxpayers are required to make federal tax deposits for payroll taxes, corporate income tax, and back-up withholding electronically through use of the electronic federal tax payment system (EFTPS). Paper coupons are discontinued as the paper coupon system is no longer maintained by the Treasury Department. The primary exception is for employers that have $2,500 or less in quarterly payroll tax liability who may pay this liability when filing the quarterly employment tax return.

 Officers and/or employees of a corporation or partnership can become personally liable for failure to withhold and remit federal employment taxes. If you are using a payroll service to make your deposits, you should ensure that the payments are made timely. Penalties can equal the amount of the tax due (100% penalty). If you are having difficulty paying your employment taxes timely, please call us.

 The net FUTA rate for most Pennsylvania and New Jersey employers is 0.6% for 2019. The 2020 net FUTA tax rates are likely to approximate the same. FUTA tax continues to be assessed on the first $7,000 of wages paid to each worker during a calendar year.

 The Internal Revenue Service’s deadline for submitting government copies of the 2019 Form W-2 to the Social Security Administration is January 31, 2020. This is the same as the deadline to furnish employees with their forms.

 SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE TAXES

 For 2020, the taxable social security wage base limit is $137,700. The employee and employer tax rate for social security is 6.2%. In 2020, all wages are taxable for the Medicare portion of the tax which is 1.45% for both employees and employers. The self-employment tax rate will be 15.3% on the first $137,700 of net earnings.  

 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) imposes an additional 0.9% Medicare tax on wages, compensation, or self-employment income exceeding the threshold amount $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly, $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately, and $200,000 for other taxpayers. There is no corresponding amount owed by the employer. Employers must withhold Additional Medicare tax from wages it pays to an individual in excess of $200,000 in a calendar year. If individuals anticipate owing more Additional Medicare tax than the amount withheld, they should request additional income tax withholding using Form W-4 and/or should make estimated tax payments. Taxpayers will calculate Additional Medicare tax liabilities on their individual income tax returns (Form 1040), and will apply any Additional Medicare tax withheld against all taxes shown on this return.

 PENNSYLVANIA PERSONAL INCOME TAXES

 The withholding rate remains at 3.07%. The PA Dept. of Revenue no longer provides paper coupon booklets. Instead, employer returns and payments should be filed using three electronic options: Internet, Tele file or third-party software. If you have not yet registered under one of these methods, we encourage you to do so. If you want our help in using these filing methods, please call us. More information can be obtained via the internet at www.revenue.pa.gov and www.etides.state.pa.us. Employers may still file using paper returns and checks, however, we recommend that you switch to the D.O.R. mandated methods.

 PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

The first $10,000 of wages paid to each worker in calendar year 2020 is taxed at the employer’s standard rate, as provided by the State. In addition, employers are required to withhold unemployment taxes from employees’ gross wages at a rate of 0.06%. The amount of compensation subject to employee withholding is not limited. Pennsylvania employers are required to electronically file quarterly UC tax and wage reports through the Unemployment Compensation Management System (UCMS). The Department of Labor is no longer mailing paper UC-2 forms to employers. Additional information is available at www.dli.state.pa.us.

 PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENT

             Employers who file 10 or more W-2 forms with the Department are now required to file those forms electronically. Employers should visit e-TIDES, the Department’s online system for business taxes, at www.etides.state.pa.us to file their Annual Withholding Reconciliation Statement (REV-1667). The REV-1667 must be filed by January 31, 2020. Copies of the Individual Wage Statement (W-2) must also be filed electronically with the form REV-1667.

             The PA Department of Revenue has expanded the EFW2 and CSV format specifications to include corrections for filing the W-2/1099 information for tax year 2019. Corrected W-2/1099 information can only be submitted for original filings done through e-TIDES.

             Additional information regarding the electronic filing requirement is available through the Department’s Business Taxes e-Services Center by accessing its website www.revenue.pa.gov or calling 717-787-8326.

 PHILADELPHIA CITY WAGE TAX

 Employers must withhold city wage taxes for residents at the rate of 3.8712% (.038712) and nonresidents who work in the city at the rate of 3.4481% (.034481). Every Pennsylvania employer who employs a Philadelphia resident must register with the Philadelphia City Revenue Commissioner and withhold the city wage tax. Please note that Philadelphia commonly changes these rates in July each year.

 LOCAL PAYROLL TAXES

PA Act 32 - Local Earned Income Tax Law

 The Pennsylvania law known as “Act 32” requires every business that employs individuals who work within Pennsylvania, either at a worksite or from their homes to withhold the applicable local earned income tax amount from employees’ wages and to remit this timely to the appropriate tax collection agency. The employer must withhold the greater of the employee’s resident tax rate for where they live or nonresident tax rate for where they work. Each employee must complete a Residency Certification Form, to identify the proper subdivision where they live and work. Additional information regarding Act 32 is available through the PA Department of Community and Economic Development by accessing its website www.dced.PA.gov or calling 1-866-466-3972.

Philadelphia is not regulated by Act 32, so the present system administered by the Philadelphia Department of Revenue remains in effect.

 Local Services Tax (LST)                                                          

 The Local Services Tax (LST) allows local governments to levy a tax of $10 to $52 per employee per year. If the locality levies a tax of $10, then the employer should withhold the tax from the first paycheck of the employee unless the employee qualifies for an exemption. The LST exempts employees who make less than $12,000 annually from the tax. The LST also exempts disabled veterans and reservists who are called to active duty at any time during the year from the tax. The employer must obtain and retain exemption certificates from such employees to document the non-withholding exemption. The LST (if more than $10) is not collected at one time, but must be withheld pro rata during the year with each payroll.

 NEW HIRE REPORTING

Federal regulation mandates all employers to report information about any new employee within 20 days of their hire date. Penalties for noncompliance can be up to $500 per employee. Mandatory information to report for all Pennsylvania employers includes: employee’s name, address, social security number, date of birth and hire date, also employer’s name, address, federal identification number, contact and phone number. Employers may report their new hire information by either manual or electronic means. Multi-state employers must report employees either by magnetic tape or electronically. Additional information can be obtained at www.cwds.pa.gov or call 1-888-PAHIRES.

 RETIREMENT PLANS

 *     The limitation on the exclusion for elective deferrals under 401(k) and other plans is increased from $19,000 in 2019 to $19,500 in 2020. Taxpayers who are age 50 and older (during 2020) can make an additional catch-up contribution in the amount of $6,500 in 2020.

 *     401(k) and 403(b) plans may offer qualified Roth contributions that allow employees to elect to make all or a portion of their 401(k) contributions on an after-tax basis. Similar to Roth IRA’s, earnings grow tax free and, in most circumstances, distributions are free from tax when withdrawn. Your plan documents must explicitly allow designated Roth contributions.

 *     The annual compensation limit taken into account for qualified plan purposes is increased from $280,000 in 2019 to $285,000 in 2020.

 *     The maximum annual amount of salary reduction contributions to a SIMPLE retirement plan is increased from $13,000 in 2019 to $13,500 in 2020. Taxpayers who are age 50 and older (during 2020) can make an additional contribution of $3,000 in 2020.

 *     The limitation on the annual benefit under a defined benefit plan is increased from $225,000 in 2019 to $230,000 in 2020. The limitation for defined contribution plans is increased from $56,000 in 2019 to $57,000 in 2020.

 *     The amount used to identify highly compensated employees for non-discrimination testing purposes is increased from $125,000 in 2019 to $130,000 in 2020.

 MINIMUM WAGE RATE

            The minimum wage rate for Pennsylvania is currently set at $7.25 per hour. A proposal to raise the minimum wage by $2.25 over the next three years is advancing in the state legislature.

 STANDARD MILEAGE RATES

 The standard mileage rate for business automobile usage is 57½ cents per mile in 2020, down from 58 cents per mile in 2019. The optional mileage allowance deduction may be used for both leased and purchased autos. If you elect the standard mileage rate for a leased auto, that method must be used for the entire lease period of that auto.

 NON-CASH FRINGE BENEFITS

 As noted above, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act modifies or eliminates the tax-favored treatment of certain fringe benefits such as moving expenses. The rules regarding the taxation and reporting of other fringe benefits still apply. Taxable fringe benefits include the following: the cost of nondiscriminatory group-term life insurance provided to employees in excess of $50,000; personal use of an employer provided vehicle; the cost of life insurance (other than group-term) provided to employees where the employee may determine the beneficiary; and discriminatory payments to key employees under educational assistance plans, self-insured medical reimbursement plans, dependent care assistance programs and group legal service plans.

 1099 REPORTING

             Report on Form 1099-MISC payments made in the course of your business. Personal payments are not reportable. Form 1099-MISC must be issued to persons and unincorporated entities (including partnerships and LLCs not taxed as corporations) receiving at least $600 for: 1) services rendered other than as an employee; 2) rent; 3) prizes; 4) medical and health care payments; or 5) other payments. Form 1099-MISC is not required to be filed for payments for merchandise, payments made via credit card, nor most payments to corporations, subject to some exceptions. You must also file Form 1099-MISC for each person from whom you have withheld any federal income tax under the backup withholding rules regardless of the amount of payment. In addition, use Form 1099-MISC to report that you made direct sales of at least $5,000 of consumer products to a buyer for resale anywhere other than a permanent retail establishment. Form 1099-INT should be filed to report interest payments of at least $10.

 The filing deadline for Form 1099-MISC to report non-employee compensation in Box 7 and the related Form 1096 is January 31, 2020. For all other reported payments, file Form 1099 by February 28, 2020. The forms generally should be provided to recipients by January 31, 2020. Penalties for late filing, non-filing, or filing incorrect information range from $50 per information return to the greater of $550 or 10% of the aggregate dollar amount of the items required to be reported correctly. In certain instances, these penalties may be higher. Should you require our assistance in preparing these forms, please submit all information to us as soon as possible to allow for timely filing and to avoid the assessment of significant penalties. We recommend that you collect names, addresses and taxpayer identification numbers for every payee and vendor with whom you transact business. Forms W-9 should be used for this purpose and may be obtained via the internet at www.irs.gov or from our website.

             Companies paying non-employee compensation for Pennsylvania based work must submit copies of federal forms 1099-MISC to the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue at the same time they are due to the Internal Revenue Service. Payors of $5,000 or more for Pennsylvania-sourced work to nonresident individuals or to disregarded entities owned by nonresident individuals are required to withhold Pennsylvania personal income tax from such payments at a rate of 3.07%. Similarly, a business making rent or royalty payments exceeding $5,000 to nonresidents with regard to Pennsylvania property is required to withhold Pennsylvania personal income tax on such payments. These new withholding rules require electronically filed copies of IRS Form 1099-MISC with the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, as well as quarterly withholding returns and annual reconciliations.

             Rental property owners may benefit from the Qualified Business Income (QBI) Deduction under Sec. 199A of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The 20% QBI deduction is available only for activities that qualify as a trade or business. The regulations are complex in determining whether a rental real estate activity qualifies as a trade or business for purposes of this deduction. The issuance of Forms 1099-MISC, where applicable, may be helpful in establishing this trade or business motive.

 The issue of whether workers should be classified as employees or as independent contractors remains the focus of Internal Revenue Service scrutiny. In determining appropriate worker classification, businesses must weigh a variety of factors. Some will dictate in favor of employee status while others will be indicative of independent contractor status. No single factor establishes the outcome, and all must be carefully considered within the context of the relationship. Improper reporting of workers can result in a requirement to pay back taxes plus interest and punitive penalties. Additional guidance with regard to this complex and important determination may be found at www.irs.gov (search “worker classification”). Should you have any questions, please call us.

 HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENT

 The maximum salary reduction contribution to a health flexible spending arrangement (health FSA) is $2,750 for 2020. Any salary reductions in excess of this amount will be subject to tax on distributions from the health FSA.

 THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (ACA)

Beginning in 2019, the TCJA eliminates the individual mandate imposing a penalty on those individuals failing to have health insurance coverage required under ACA; however, other provisions of the ACA are still in effect. Generally, ACA requires employers with at least 50 full-time equivalent employees (FTE) to provide health coverage, or risk paying a penalty. ACA also requires employers and insurers to report certain information to the Internal Revenue Service.

 In addition, ACA requires certain employers to report on Form W-2 the aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored health coverage paid during the calendar year. The aggregate reportable cost is reported on Form W-2 in Box 12, using Code DD. Pending further guidance from the IRS, transition relief of this disclosure requirement may apply to certain small employers who issue less than 250 W-2 Forms each year. A detailed analysis for implementing these provisions is beyond the scope of this newsletter, but please contact us if further guidance is needed in regard to the Affordable Care Act.

 EMPLOYEE BUSINESS EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS

 If an employee is reimbursed for business expenses under an “accountable plan”, the reimbursements are not treated as taxable income to the employee. An accountable plan must require the employee to: 1) substantiate the nature and amount of the expenses, and 2) repay to the employer any reimbursements in excess of the business expenses incurred. Please contact us if you need assistance in designing an accountable plan.

 ANNUAL LEASE VALUE AMOUNTS FOR PERSONAL USE OF COMPANY CARS

 The “Annual Lease Value” (ALV) table, as issued by the Internal Revenue Service (www.irs.gov), shows the annual value to employees for the personal use of a company car. This ALV amount of the auto is includible in the employee’s income, unless the car is used exclusively for business purposes. If the car is used partly for personal driving, a percentage of the ALV (based on the percentage of personal use) is reported on the employee’s W-2. Note that the ALV does not change each year. Instead, it is treated as constant for each of the first four years of use. If the company car is still in use after four years, it is revalued at the beginning of the fifth year, and the ALV based on this new fair market value is used for the next four years of employee use. The ALV includes the value of auto insurance, registration fees and repairs paid by the company. It does not include the cost of fuel. If the company pays for fuel, the cost consumed in personal driving is additional W-2 income to the employee. A standard rate of 5½ cents per mile (based on 2019 rates) may be used in computing income attributable to personal fuel costs paid by the employer.

 OVERTIME UPDATE

             The U.S. Department of Labor has finalized a rule expanding overtime pay eligibility for certain American workers. This rule increases the minimum salary requirement to be considered exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act and is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2020. Please contact us for the specifics of these regulations.

DISCLOSURE

 The above synopses are brief reviews of general payroll tax issues. They are not intended to be complete explanations or to provide tax advice for specific fact patterns. Please discuss any decision concerning specific situations with a tax advisor qualified on such issues.

The IRS has released new proposed rules related to charitable contributions made to get around the $10,000/$5,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. The proposed regulations:

The IRS has released new proposed rules related to charitable contributions made to get around the $10,000/$5,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. The proposed regulations:

• incorporate the safe harbor in Notice 2019-12 for individuals who have any portion of a charitable deduction disallowed to the receipt of SALT benefits;
• incorporate the safe harbor in Rev. Proc. 2019-12 for business entities to deduct certain payments made to a charitable organization in exchange for SALT benefits; and
• clarify the application of the quid pro quo principle under Code Sec. 170 to benefits received or expected to be received by the donor from a third party.

SALT Limit

An individual’s itemized deduction of SALT taxes is limited to $10,000 ($5,000 if married filing separately) for tax years beginning after 2017. Some states and local governments have adopted laws that allowed individuals to receive a state tax credit for contributions to certain charitable funds. These laws are aimed at getting around the SALT deduction limit by creating a charitable deduction for federal income tax purposes.

The IRS issued final regulations in June 2019 that provide that the receipt of a SALT credit for a charitable contribution is the receipt of a return benefit (quid pro quo benefit). Thus, the taxpayer must reduce any contribution deduction by the amount of any SALT credit received or expected to receive in return. The regulations contain a de minimis exception if the SALT credit does not exceed 15 percent of the taxpayer’s charitable payment.

A taxpayer is not required to reduce the charitable contribution deduction because of the receipt of SALT deductions. However, the taxpayer must reduce the charitable deduction if it receives or expects to receive SALT deductions in excess of the taxpayer’s payment or the fair market value of property transferred.

Payments by Individuals

A safe harbor was provided in Notice 2019-12 for individuals who have a portion of a charitable deduction disallowed due to the receipt of a SALT credit. Under the safe harbor, any disallowed portion of the charitable contribution deduction may be treated as the payment of SALT taxes for the purposes of deducting taxes under Code Sec. 164.

The new proposed regulations incorporate the safe harbor in Notice 2019-12. The safe harbor is allowed in the tax year the charitable payment is made, but only to the extent that the SALT credit is applied as provided under state or local law to offset the individual’s SALT liability for the current or preceding tax year. Any unused credit may be carried forward as provided under state and local law.

Payments by Business Entities

The IRS also provided a safe harbor in Rev. Proc. 2019-12 that business entities may continue to deduct charitable contributions in exchange a SALT credit. A business entity may deduct the payments as ordinary and necessary business expenses under Code Sec. 162 if made for a business purpose.

The new proposed regulations incorporate the safe harbor in Rev. Proc. 2019-12. If a C corporation or specified pass-through entity makes the charitable payment in exchange for a SALT credit, it may deduct the payment as a business expense to the extent of any SALT credit received or expected to be received. In addition, the new proposal provides that if the charitable payment bears a direct relationship to the taxpayer’s business then it may be deducted as a business expense rather than a charitable contribution regardless of whether the taxpayer receives or expects to receive a SALT credit.

Benefits Received from Third Party

If a taxpayer receives any goods, services, or other benefits from a charitable organization in consideration for a contribution, then the charitable deduction must be reduced by the value of those benefits. If the contribution exceeds the fair market value of the benefits received, then only the excess is a deductible as a charitable contribution.

The new proposed regulations clarify that this quid pro quo principal applies regardless of whether the party providing the goods, services, or other benefits is the charitable organization or not. A taxpayer will be treated under the proposal as receiving goods and services in consideration for the taxpayer’s charitable contribution if, at the time the taxpayer makes the payment or transfer, the taxpayer receives or expects to receive goods or services in return.

Final regulations provide rules on the attribution of ownership of stock or other interests, for determining whether a person is a related person with respect to a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) under the foreign base company sales income rules. The regulations also provide rules to determine whether a CFC receives rents in the active conduct of a trade or business, for determining the exception from foreign personal holding company income.

Final regulations provide rules on the attribution of ownership of stock or other interests, for determining whether a person is a related person with respect to a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) under the foreign base company sales income rules. The regulations also provide rules to determine whether a CFC receives rents in the active conduct of a trade or business, for determining the exception from foreign personal holding company income.

The regulations adopt without change, proposed regulations published on May 20, 2019 ( NPRM REG-125135-15).

Attribution of Ownership

The regulations provide specific rules for applying principles similar to those in the Code Sec. 958(b) constructive ownership rules when determining related person status under the foreign base company sales income rules. The determination of related person status is relevant for many purposes, including whether certain types of income can be characterized as subpart F foreign base company sales or service income.

A person is a related person with respect to a CFC if the person is:

• an individual who controls the CFC,
• an entity that controls or is controlled by the CFC, or
• an entity that is controlled by the same person that controls the CFC.

Rules similar to those for determining stock ownership in Code Sec. 958 apply for purposes of determining whether a person is a related person. The regulations limit the application of the downward attribution rules in Code Sec. 318(a)(3), which apply by reference to the Code Sec. 958 stock ownership rules, and which attribute ownership downward from the owner of an entity to an entity. The downward attribution rules are applied regardless of the size of the ownership interest in a partnership, estate, or trust, but are applied to corporations based on a 50-percent or more ownership interest.

The regulations address concern that application of the downward attribution rules could inappropriately treat entities (including CFCs) that do not have significant relationships with each other as related persons. Accordingly, the regulations provide that the downward attribution rules of Code Sec. 318(a)(3) and Reg. §1.958-2(d) will not apply for purposes of determining related person status under the foreign base company sales income rules.

The change does not preclude a corporation, partnership, trust, or estate from being treated as controlled by the same person or persons that control the CFC under other rules that remain applicable for the related person rules.

Additionally, an anti-abuse rule is provided with respect to the option attribution rule in Code Sec. 318(a)(4). The option attribution rule in Code Sec. 318(a)(4) and Reg. §1.958-2(e) will not be applied to treat a person with an option as owning the stock or an equity interest for purposes of the related person rule if the principal purpose of using the option was to cause a person to be treated as a related person.

The regulations also incorporate a similar rule issued in section 7(d) of Notice 2007-9, 2007-1 CB 401. The rule applies if the principal purpose for the use of an option is to qualify dividends, interest, rents or royalties paid by a foreign corporation for the Code Sec. 954(c)(6) CFC look-through exception from foreign personal holding company income. The rule applies to tax years of CFCs beginning after December 31, 2006, and ending before November 19, 2019, and to tax years of U.S. shareholders in which or with which such tax years end.

Personal Holding Company Income

The regulations modify the foreign personal holding company rules for amounts paid or incurred by a CFC in connection with the CFC’s rental income and the active rents exception. Rents are excluded from foreign personal holding company income if the rents are:

• received from a person other than a related person, and
• from the active conduct of a trade or business.

If rents are from leasing property as a result of marketing activities, there must be a substantial marketing organization in order to meet the active trade or business test. Under a safe harbor, an organization is substantial if active leasing expenses equal or exceed 25 percent of adjusted leasing profit. If the CFC receives rents from property it does not own, the substantiality of the organization is determined net of those rent payments.

The regulations extend the rule to apply to royalties in addition to rents. As a result, the substantiality of the organization is determined under the safe harbor net of the rents or royalties paid or incurred by the lessor CFC, for the right to use the property (or a component part of the property) that generated the rental income.

Applicability Date

The regulations generally apply to tax years of CFCs ending on or after November 19, 2019, and to tax years of U.S. shareholders in which or with which such tax years end. The regulations on the downward attribution rule, and the option anti-abuse rule for use of the option to treat a person as a related person with respect to a CFC, apply to tax years of CFCs ending on or after May 17, 2019, and to tax years of U.S. shareholders in which or with which such tax years end, with respect to amounts received or accrued by a CFC on or after May 17, 2019, to the extent the amounts are received or accrued in advance of the period to which such amounts are attributable with a principal purpose of avoiding application of the rules.

The IRS has issued final and proposed regulations implementing the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) under Code Sec. 59A. The BEAT is a minimum tax that certain large corporations must pay on certain payments made to foreign related parties, and was added by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ( P.L. 115-97).

The IRS has issued final and proposed regulations implementing the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) under Code Sec. 59A. The BEAT is a minimum tax that certain large corporations must pay on certain payments made to foreign related parties, and was added by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ( P.L. 115-97).

The final regulations adopt proposed rules ( REG-104259-18) published on December 21, 2018 (2018 proposed regulations), with certain modifications. The proposed regulations ( REG-112607-19) (2019 proposed regulations) provide rules under Code Secs. 59A and 6031 regarding certain aspects of the BEAT.

Final Regulations

The 2018 proposed regulations provided guidance related to the mechanics of determining a taxpayer’s BEAT liability, and addressed application of the BEAT to partnerships, banks, registered security dealers, and consolidated groups. The final BEAT regulations retain the basic approach and structure of the 2018 proposed regulations, with certain revisions.

The final regulations continue to be exclude from the denominator of the base erosion percentage Code Sec. 988 losses with respect to transactions with foreign related parties that are excluded from the numerator of the percentage. The final regulations also retain the add-back method for computing modified taxable income and the computation of base erosion minimum tax amount (BEMTA) on a taxpayer-by-taxpayer basis.

Among some of the more significant changes to the proposed rules, the final regulations:

• adopt the "with-or-within" method to determine the gross receipts and the base erosion percentage of an aggregate group;
• disregard transactions between parties if both parties were members of the aggregate group at the time of the transaction;
• exclude the base erosion tax benefits and deductions attributable to the tax year of a member of an aggregate group that begins before January 1, 2018;
• clarify that payments resulting in a reduction to determine gross income are not treated as base erosion payments;
• require that the determination of whether a payment or accrual is a base erosion payment be made under general U.S. federal income tax law;
• clarify the definition of a "base erosion payment," and generally exclude amounts transferred to, or exchanged with, a foreign related party in certain corporate nonrecognition transactions from that definition;
• clarify the rules for determining the portion of U.S. branch interest paid to foreign related parties;
• provide rules for the treatment of an interest expense determined under a U.S. tax treaty;
  include additional detail on the documentation required to satisfy the service cost method (SCM) exception;
• modify the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) exception;
• provide that the additional one percent add-on to the BEAT rate will not apply to a taxpayer that is part of an affiliated group with de minimis banking and securities dealer activities;
• provide that Code Sec. 15 applies only to the change in tax rate set forth in Code Sec. 59A(b)(2) and should not apply to the change in tax rate included in Code Sec. 59A(b)(1)(A) for tax years beginning in calendar year 2018;
• change the Qualified Derivative Payments (QDP) exception;
• clarify the rules regarding how partnerships and their partners are treated for purposes of the BEAT; and
• clarify the anti-abuse rule and certain rules applicable to insurance companies and consolidated groups.

Applicability Dates

The final regulations (other than the reporting requirements for QDPs) apply to tax years ending on or after December 17, 2018. However, taxpayers may apply these final regulations in their entirety for tax years ending before December 17, 2018. Taxpayers may also apply provisions matching Reg. §§1.59A-1 through 1.59A-9 in their entirety for all tax years ending on or before December 6, 2019. Taxpayers choosing to apply the proposed regulations must apply them consistently and cannot selectively choose which particular provisions to apply.

The related Code Sec. 6038A regulations apply to tax years beginning Monday, June 7, 2021. The related consolidated return regulations generally apply to tax years for which the original consolidated return is due (without extensions) after December 6, 2019.

2019 Proposed Regulations

The 2019 proposed regulations provide rules regarding relating to (1) how a taxpayer determines its aggregate group for purposes of determining gross receipts and the base erosion percentage; (2) an election to waive deductions; and (3) application of the BEAT to partnerships.

The 2019 proposed regulations generally apply to tax years beginning on or after the date that the final regulations are filed with the Federal Register. Certain rules, however, have specific applicability dates. In addition, taxpayers may rely on the rules in the proposed regulations in their entirety for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before the final regulations are applicable.

Practitioner’s Observations

Arlene Fitzpatrick, a Principal in the National Tax Department of Ernst & Young LLP, told Wolters Kluwer that "there are changes and new proposed rules in the package of final and proposed regulations that are helpful, though not all changes requested through the comment process were made. For example, the rules in the final regulations to exclude, in certain circumstances, from the definition of a base erosion payment amounts transferred to, or exchanged with, a foreign related party pursuant to a specified nonrecognition transaction are welcome. Furthermore, clarifying that a built-in loss recognized on a sale or transfer of property to a foreign related party is not in itself a deduction that causes the payment to be treated as a base erosion payment is helpful. The final regulations however, retain the internal dealings rule whereby a notional payment for purposes of attribution of profits under certain tax treaties may be taken into account for purposes of determining BEAT. Thus, although deductions from internal dealings would not be allowed under the Code or regulations, and only relevant under certain treaties (the regulations do not specify the treaties), the regulations provide such amounts are relevant for purposes of determining BEAT."

The IRS has issued highly anticipated final regulations on the significant changes made to the foreign tax credit rules by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97). The final regulations retain the basic approach and structure of the 2018 proposed regulations ( NPRM REG-105600-18). The final regulations also eliminate deadwood, reflect statutory amendments made prior to TCJA, and update expense allocation rules not updated since 1988.

The IRS has issued highly anticipated final regulations on the significant changes made to the foreign tax credit rules by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97). The final regulations retain the basic approach and structure of the 2018 proposed regulations ( NPRM REG-105600-18). The final regulations also eliminate deadwood, reflect statutory amendments made prior to TCJA, and update expense allocation rules not updated since 1988.

Also adopted are proposed regulations on overall foreign losses, published on June 25, 2012 ( NPRM REG-134935-11), and a U.S. taxpayer’s obligation to notify the IRS of a foreign tax redetermination, published on November 7, 2007 ( NPRM REG-209020-86).

A separate set of 2019 proposed regulations were also issued ( NPRM REG-105495-19).

Final Regulations

The final regulations make extensive changes to the rules on the determination of the foreign tax credit. Many of these changes were required to implement the TCJA, including the items discussed, below.

The final regulations provide details on how income is assigned and expenses are apportioned to the Code Sec. 951A global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) and foreign branch foreign tax credit separate limitation categories added by TCJA.

The regulations provide that, for purposes of applying the expense allocation and apportionment rules, the portion of gross income related to foreign derived intangible income (FDII) or a GILTI inclusion that is offset by a Code Sec. 250 deduction is treated as exempt income. This means that fewer expenses will be allocated to the GILTI category, resulting in a higher foreign source taxable income, a higher foreign tax credit limitation, and a larger foreign tax credit offset with respect to GILTI income.

The regulations also address how the balance of foreign tax credit carryovers prior to the TCJA are allocated across new and existing separate categories. Under a default rule, foreign tax credit carryovers remain in the general category going forward. A taxpayer can elect to reconstruct the carryover regarding a foreign branch. The final regulations provide a simplified rule under which taxpayers can assign foreign tax credits to the foreign branch category proportionately, according to the ratio of foreign taxes paid or accrued by the taxpayer’s branches to total foreign taxes paid or accrued by the taxpayer in that year.

The regulations modify the proposed rule for determining foreign branch income based on the U.S. tax-adjusted books and records of the foreign branch. The proposed regulations disregarded transfers of intellectual property (IP) between a foreign branch and its owner if the transfer would result in a deemed payment that reallocates income between the foreign branch category and the general branch category. The final regulations limit the rule to transactions that occurred after the date of the proposed regulations and include an exception for transitory ownership.

The regulations provide rules for the treatment of GILTI for purposes of the interest allocation rules. In general, a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) must allocate and apportion its interest expense among groups of income for purposes of determining tested income, subpart F income and other types of net foreign source income. A U.S. taxpayer must characterize the value of its CFC for allocating and apportioning its own interest expense. A CFC allocates and apportions its interest expense using either the modified gross income (MGI) method or the asset method. The U.S. taxpayer uses the same method to characterize the stock of its CFC. The regulations take into account gross tested income from a lower-tier CFC with respect to an upper-tier CFC for allocating the upper-tier CFC’s interest expense when applying the MGI method.

Dividends, interest, rents and royalties (look-through payments) paid to a U.S. shareholder by a CFC were generally allocated to general category income to the extent that they were not treated as passive category income. Because this type of payment made directly by a U.S. shareholder is not included in the GILTI category, the regulations provide that the look-through payments are assigned either to the general category or the foreign branch category. The payments cannot be assigned to the GILTI category.

The final regulations also address certain potentially abusive borrowing arrangements involving loans by U.S. persons to foreign partnerships that artificially increase foreign source income and the foreign tax credit limitation without affecting U.S. taxable income. Under the regulations, the interest income attributable to borrowing through a partnership is allocated across the foreign tax credit separate limitation categories in the same manner as the associated interest expense.

Applicability of Final Regs

The final regulations related to statutory amendments made by the TCJA apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Regulations that contain both rules that relate to the TCJA and rules that do not relate to the TCJA generally apply to tax years that both (1) begin after December 31, 2017, and (2) end on or after December 4, 2018.

The regulations on the deemed paid credit under Code Sec. 960 apply to tax years that both begin after December 31, 2017, and end on or after December 4, 2018. The final OFL regulations apply to tax years on or after the date the regulations are filed in the Federal Register. The final foreign tax redetermination regulations apply to foreign tax redeterminations occurring in tax years ending on or after the date the regulations are filed in the Federal Register.

Proposed Regulations

Proposed foreign tax credit regulations address changes made by the TCJA, and also respond to issues raised in the 2018 proposed regulations on the foreign tax credit ( NPRM REG-105600-18). The proposed regulations address:

• the allocation and apportionment of deductions under Code Sec. 861 through Code Sec. 865;
• the definition of "financial services income" under Code Sec. 904(d)(2)(D);
• the allocation and apportionment of creditable foreign taxes;
• the interaction of branch loss and dual consolidated loss recapture rules under Code Sec. 904(f) and Code Sec. 904(g);
• the effect of Code Sec. 905(c) foreign tax redeterminations of foreign corporations on the high-tax exception in Code Sec. 954(b)(4) and the required notification and penalty provisions;
• the definition of "personal holding company income" under Code Sec. 954; and
• the application of the foreign tax credit limitation rule to consolidated groups.

Allocation and Apportionment

Under the general rule, a taxpayer may allocate research and experimentation (R&E) expenses to the foreign tax credit separate limitation categories under the sales method or the gross income method. The proposed regulations revise the sales method to provide that R&E expenses are only allocated to income that represents return on intellectual property. When applying these rules, gross intangible income does not include dividends or amounts included under subpart F, GILTI or Code Sec. 1293. As a result, none of a U.S. taxpayer’s R&E expenses are allocated to the GILTI category. The proposed regulations eliminate the gross income method for purposes of allocating R&E expenses.

Stewardship expenses are related and allocable to dividends received or to be received from related corporations. The proposed regulations provide that stewardship expenses are allocated to subpart F and GILTI inclusions, to Code Sec. 78 dividends and all amounts included under the passive foreign investment company (PFIC) provisions.

Under the Code Sec. 818(f) allocation rules that apply to life insurance companies, expenses are generally apportioned ratably across all gross income. Under a new rule, the proposed regulations allocate expenses in a life-nonlife consolidated group solely among items of the insurance company that has reserves (separate entity method).

The final foreign tax credit limitations provide a matching rule for a U.S. partner that makes loans to a foreign partnership. Under the rule, the partner’s gross interest income is apportioned between U.S. and foreign sources in each separate foreign tax credit limitation category based on the partner’s interest expense apportionment ratios. The proposed regulations provide the same rule for loans from partnerships to U.S. partners (upstream partnership loans).

Redeterminations

Portions of the 2007 temporary regulations on foreign tax redeterminations ( T.D. 9362) are reproposed so that taxpayers can provide comments on the rules in light of the changes made by the TCJA. The proposed regulations address foreign tax redeterminations that affect the deemed paid credit under Code Sec. 960; procedural notification rules; and penalties for failure to notify the IRS of a foreign tax redetermination.

The proposed regulations require taxpayers to account for foreign tax redeterminations of foreign subsidiaries on an amended return that reflects the revised foreign taxes deemed paid under Code Sec. 960 and any changes to the taxpayer’s U.S. tax liability. This reflects the repeal of the pooling mechanism to account for redeterminations of foreign taxes.

A transition rule provides that post-2017 redeterminations of pre-2018 foreign income taxes must be made by adjusting the foreign corporation’s taxable income and earnings and profits and post-1986 undistributed earnings and income taxes in the pre-2018 year to which the redetermined foreign taxes relate. The proposed regulations also provide that the foreign tax redetermination rules cover situations in which the foreign tax redetermination affects whether or not the CFC qualifies for the high-tax exceptions under GILTI and subpart F.

Additional Rules

Additional provisions in the proposed regulations:

• modify the definition of a "financial services entity" by adopting a definition of "predominately engaged in the active conduct of a banking, insurance, finance, or similar business" and "income derived in the active conduct of a banking, insurance, finance, or similar business" that is generally consistent with Code Secs. 954(h), 1297(b)(2)(B), and 953(e);
• provide more detailed guidance on the allocation and apportionment of foreign income taxes, and generalize the rules to apply to statutory and residual groupings;
• provide a new ordering rule for overall foreign loss recapture that addresses additional income recognition under the branch loss recapture and dual consolidated loss recapture rules: the amounts are not taken into account for purposes of the ordering rules until Code Sec. 904(f)(3) amounts are determined;
• clarify the rules that apply to jurisdictions that do not impose corporate income tax on CFCs until earnings are distributed. or where foreign tax is contingent on a future distributions, for purposes of the high-tax exception in Code Sec. 954(b)(4);
• apply the principles for allocating and apportioning foreign income taxes for purposes of Code Sec. 965(g); and
• update the Code Sec. 1502 regulations relating to the computation of the consolidated foreign tax credit to reflect changes in the law, and add new rules for the determining the source and separate category of the a consolidated NOL, as well as the portion of a consolidated net operating loss (CNOL) that is apportioned to a separate return year of a member.

Applicability of Proposed Regs

The proposed regulations are generally proposed to apply to tax years that end on or after the date the proposed regulations are filed in the Federal Register, with exceptions. For example, the rules for R&E expenses are proposed to apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2019. However taxpayers on the sales method for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2020, may rely on the proposed regulations if the rules are applied consistently. Thus, a taxpayer on the sales method for its tax year beginning in 2018 may rely on the proposed regulation, but must also apply the sales method (relying on the proposed regulation) for its tax year beginning in 2019.

Practitioner’s Observations

WK: Were you surprised by anything in the final regs?

Martin Milner: The final regulations are generally consistent with the proposed regulations and do not include any major surprises. The changes and clarifications that are in the final regulations are largely helpful. As would be expected, most of the new provisions are in the proposed portion of the package.

WK: With the proposed regs are there areas that you can see may result in pushback? If so why?

Martin Milner: The business community is likely to comment on the proposal to apportion stewardship expenses to dividends, subpart F income and GILTI (including IRC Section 78 gross-ups) because many had hoped that stewardship expenses would not be apportioned to GILTI.

WK: How did you feel about the R&E Expense Apportionment changes?

Martin Milner: The mandatory sales-based apportionment of R&E expenses to all gross intangible income related to the relevant product SIC code will be complicated in practice. However, it is helpful that the proposed rules specifically exclude dividends, subpart F income and GILTI.

The IRS has released guidance that provides that the requirement to report partners’ shares of partnership capital on the tax basis method will not be effective for 2019 partnership tax years, but will first apply to 2020 partnership tax years.

The IRS has released guidance that provides that the requirement to report partners’ shares of partnership capital on the tax basis method will not be effective for 2019 partnership tax years, but will first apply to 2020 partnership tax years.

2019 Reporting

For 2019, partnerships and other persons must report partner capital accounts consistent with the reporting requirements in the 2018 forms and instructions, including the requirement to report negative tax basis capital accounts on a partner-by-partner basis.

Section 704(c) Gain or Loss

As a clarification, the notice also defines the term "partner’s share of net unrecognized Code Sec. 704(c) gain or loss," which must be reported by partnerships and other persons in 2019. Further, the notice exempts publicly traded partnerships from the requirement to report their partners’ shares of net unrecognized Code Sec. 704(c) gain or loss until further notice. Solely for purposes of completing the 2019 Forms 1065, Schedule K-1, Item N, and 8865, Schedule K-1, Item G, the notice defines a partner’s share of "net unrecognized Code Sec. 704(c) gain or loss" as the partner’s share of the net (meaning aggregate or sum) of all unrecognized gains or losses under Code Sec. 704(c) in partnership property, including Code Sec. 704(c) gains and losses arising from revaluations of partnership property.

Section 465 At-Risk Activities

The notice provides that the requirement added by the draft instructions for 2019 for partnerships to report to partners information about separate Code Sec. 465 at-risk activities will not be effective until 2020. The draft of the instructions for the 2019 Form 1065, Schedule K-1, released October 29, 2019, included a new paragraph at page 12, At-Risk Limitations, At-Risk Activity Reporting Requirements, that would expressly require partnerships or other persons that have items of income, loss, or deduction reported on the Schedule K-1 from more than one activity that may be subject to limitation under Code Sec. 465 at the partner level to report certain additional information separately for each activity on an attachment to a partner’s Schedule K-1. The new paragraph would require the partnership to identify the at-risk activity, the items of income, loss, or deduction for the activity, other items of income, loss, or deduction, partnership liabilities, and any other information that relates to the activity, such as distributions and partner loans. This requirement in the draft instructions for the 2019 Form 1065 is in addition to long-standing at-risk reporting requirements included in the instructions to the Form 1065.

Penalty Relief

Taxpayers who follow the provisions of the notice will not be subject to any penalty, including a penalty under Code Sec. 6722 for failure to furnish correct payee statements, under Code Sec. 6698 for failure to file a partnership return that shows required information, and under Code Sec. 6038 for failure to furnish information required on a Schedule K-1 (Form 8865).

The IRS has released final regulations that present guidance on how certain organizations that provide employee benefits must calculate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) under Code Sec. 512(a).

The IRS has released final regulations that present guidance on how certain organizations that provide employee benefits must calculate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) under Code Sec. 512(a).

Background

Organizations that are otherwise exempt from tax under Code Sec. 501(a) are subject to tax on their unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) under Code Sec. 511(a). Code Sec. 512(a) defines UBTI of exempt organizations and provides special rules for calculating UBTI for organizations described in Code Sec. 501(c)(7) (social and recreational clubs), voluntary employees’ beneficiary associations (VEBAs) described in Code Sec. 501(c)(9) and supplemental unemployment benefit trusts (SUBs) described in Code Sec. 501(c)(17).

Covered Entity

"Covered entity" describes VEBAs and SUBs subject to the UBTI computation rules under Code Sec. 512(a)(3). A corporation is treated as having exempt function income for a taxable year only if it files a consolidated return with the organization described in Code Sec. 501(c)(7), (9), or (17). These final regulations add a clause to clarify that the term "covered entity" includes a corporation described in Code Sec. 501(c)(2) to the extent provided in Code Sec. 512(a)(3)(C).

Nonrecognition of Gain

If a property used directly in the performance of the exempt function of a covered entity is sold by that covered entity, and other property is subsequently purchased and used by the covered entity directly in the performance of its exempt function—at any point within a four-year period beginning one year before the date of the sale and ending three years after the date of sale—gain, if any, from the sale is recognized only to the extent that the sales price of the old property exceeds the covered entity’s cost of purchasing the other property.

Limitation on Amounts Set Aside for Exempt Purposes

The total amount of investment income earned during the year should be considered when calculating whether an excess exists at the end of the year. Any investment income a covered entity earns during the taxable year is subject to unrelated business income tax (UBIT) to the extent the covered entity’s year-end assets exceed the account limit.

Effective Date

The final regulations apply to tax years beginning on or after December 10, 2019.

The IRS has issued Reg. §20.2010-1(c) to address the effect of the temporary increase in the basic exclusion amount (BEA) used in computing estate and gift taxes. In addition, Reg. §20.2010-1(e)(3) is amended to reflect the increased BEA for years 2018-2025 ($10 million, as adjusted for inflation). Further, the IRS has confirmed that taxpayers taking advantage of the increased BEA in effect from 2018 to 2025 will not be adversely affected after 2025 when the exclusion amount is set to decrease to pre-2018 levels.

The IRS has issued Reg. §20.2010-1(c) to address the effect of the temporary increase in the basic exclusion amount (BEA) used in computing estate and gift taxes. In addition, Reg. §20.2010-1(e)(3) is amended to reflect the increased BEA for years 2018-2025 ($10 million, as adjusted for inflation). Further, the IRS has confirmed that taxpayers taking advantage of the increased BEA in effect from 2018 to 2025 will not be adversely affected after 2025 when the exclusion amount is set to decrease to pre-2018 levels.

The regulations apply to estates of decedents dying on and after November 26, 2019.

Special Rule for Post-2025 Decedents

Reg. §20.2010-1(c) provides a special rule in cases where the portion of the credit against the estate tax that is based on the BEA is less than the sum of the credit amounts attributable to the BEA allowable in computing gift tax payable within the meaning of Code Sec. 2001(b)(2). In that situation, the portion of the credit against the net tentative estate tax that is attributable to the BEA is based upon the greater of those two credit amounts.

Inflation-Adjusted Amounts and DSUE Amount

Because the term "BEA" includes the exclusion amount, as adjusted for inflation, the examples in the regulations reflect hypothetical inflated adjusted BEAs. Reg. §20.2010-1(c)(2)(ii), Example 2, illustrates the application of the special rule based on gifts actually made, and would be inapplicable to a decedent who did not make gifts in excess of the date of death BEA, as adjusted for inflation.

Reg. §20.2010-1(c)(2)(iii) and (iv), Examples 3 and 4, illustrate that if a spouse dies during the increased BEA period, and the deceased spouse’s executor makes the portability election, the surviving spouse’s applicable exclusion amount includes the full amount of the deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount based on the deceased spouse’s increased BEA. The DSUE amount is available to reduce the surviving spouse’s transfer tax liability regardless of when transfers are made.

BEA Calculations

The final rules explain how to determine the extent to which a credit allowable in computing gift tax payable is based solely on the BEA. Reg. §20.2010-1(c)(2)(iv), Example 4, addresses the application of the DSUE ordering rule, as well as the computation of the credit based solely on the BEA in a calendar period in which the transfer exhausts the remaining DSUE amount with the result that the BEA is also allowable.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) has released a report on suitability checks for participation in IRS programs. TIGTA initiated this audit to assess the effectiveness of IRS processes to ensure the suitability of applicants seeking to participate in IRS programs and to follow up on IRS planned corrective actions to address prior TIGTA recommendations.

TIGTA Final Audit Report

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) has released a report on suitability checks for participation in IRS programs. TIGTA initiated this audit to assess the effectiveness of IRS processes to ensure the suitability of applicants seeking to participate in IRS programs and to follow up on IRS planned corrective actions to address prior TIGTA recommendations.

Suitability Checks

The IRS’s suitability checks for applicants to the Acceptance Agent, Enrolled Agent, and e-File Provider Programs generally ensured that only reputable individuals were accepted in the programs during fiscal year 2018. Further, the IRS’s continuous suitability checks also ensured that individuals accepted in the programs prior to the initial suitability checks had not engaged in criminal activity warranting removal from the program. TIGTA also identified that when the Federal Bureau of Investigation reported a criminal history for an applicant, the adjudication process was inconsistent depending on the program to which the individual was applying. Finally, the IRS did not take sufficient actions to address the fraudulent submission of fingerprint cards by some applicants to pass their background investigations.

TIGTA Recommendations

TIGTA recommended that the IRS:

• assess the risk to tax administration of performing inconsistent initial and continuous suitability checks on individuals seeking to participate or enrolled in the e-File Provider, Acceptance Agent, and Enrolled Agent Programs;
• assess the risk of the e-File Provider Program’s use of decision matrices to adjudicate an applicant’s criminal history that are inconsistent with the matrices used by the Acceptance Agent and Enrolled Agent Programs; and
• work with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to identify additional individuals who may have submitted fingerprint cards that match the fingerprints of another individual.

The IRS agreed with all the recommendations.