Avoid the Surprise! In the world of Income tax, 2018 saw many changes as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that was passed in 2017. To that end, what follows in this memo is a highlight of the most relevant changes and some recurring “standard” advice around which meaningful year-end planning can occur.
December 2018 Tax Planning - Avoid The Surprise!
Clients & Friends:
While the end of the year involves a lot of hustle and bustle, it also presents an opportunity to reflect on all that has unfolded over the past several months. We hope that among the many things you take the time to reflect on, tax reform and planning is atop that list.
In the world of Income tax, 2018 saw many changes as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) that was passed in 2017. We have been busy working hard to stay current on the new regulations so that we can provide effective tax planning as we wind down the year. To that end, what follows in this memo is a highlight of the most relevant changes and some recurring “standard” advice around which meaningful year-end planning can occur.
The new tax law resulted in changes/decreases to the tax tables for withholding on your paychecks. We have found that this decrease in federal tax withholding may result in the tax withheld being significantly too low and could result in a balance due on the 2018 tax return. This situation can be particularly problematic when both spouses are wage earners. It is important that you check your withholding rates now. We are happy to help with this so that you avoid any surprises come April. Simply send us over a copy of your YTD pay advice(s) and we can take a look.
Individuals are also impacted by the removal of personal exemptions and limitations on itemized deductions.
- Beginning in 2018, the itemized deduction for all state and local taxes (income and real estate) is limited to $10,000.
- Miscellaneous Itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor are suspended. The most common examples include unreimbursed business expenses, safe deposit boxes, investment advisory fees, and tax preparation fees.
Many filers who previously took itemized deductions on their return will now likely take the standard deduction as a result of these changes. The 2018 standard deduction amounts are $24,000 for joint filers and $12,000 for single filers. The standard deduction amounts above are increased for persons over 65 by $1,600 for single or Head of household filers and by $1,300 each or $2,600 for joint returns.
Beginning in 2019, the deduction for medical expenses is limited by an even higher threshold of 10%. If you expect to qualify for medical deductions in 2018 consider, to the extent possible, accelerating the payment of any discretionary medical expenses to 2018 while the threshold still remains at 7.5%.
With the standard deduction under the new TCJA increased to $24,000, another strategy for taking advantage of itemized deductions is to consider bunching the payment of any charitable contributions. Consider making two years’ worth of contributions in 2018 or in 2019 if it will help to push your itemized deductions above the amount of the new standard deduction. In this strategy you might itemize your deductions every other year and take the higher standard deduction in the off years.
One method for achieving this strategy is through the use of a Donor Advised Fund. These allow for efficient bunching of contributions because they allow you to donate cash or appreciated securities into the fund and take the tax deduction in 2018 all while deferring payment to your selected charities until 2019.
Another very tax efficient way to make charitable contributions, for those over 70 ½, is to earmark up to $100,000 of you annual Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) from your IRA account to be paid to a qualified charity. You do not get a tax deduction BUT the amount designated is excluded from your taxable income. This can be more beneficial than a deduction, as it satisfies both your annual RMD and charitable inclinations.
On the topic of securities, we advise that the donation of appreciated securities is a highly tax effective means of making contributions. You get a deduction for the full market value of the stock and do not pay the tax on any gain! If you happen to hold stocks that are losers do NOT donate those. Sell them and take the loss on your tax return. Be careful when considering the purchase of mutual funds at this time in the year. You may essentially be “buying a capital gain”, as most all mutual funds pay out gains come year end.
There are several other areas of the new tax law that provide individuals with opportunities to make the law “work for them”:
- The annual gift tax exclusion has been increased for 2018. Up from $14,000 in 2017, individuals may now gift up to $15,000 ($30,000 per beneficiary from a married couple filing jointly).We usually suggest that these gifts be given as early in the year as possible. Even with the new higher Estate tax exemption amounts this gifting routine still can result in decreased “death” taxes.
- Federal tax law now allows for 529 Plan withdrawals up to $10,000 a year to be used for qualified education expenses for each child from Kindergarten through the 12th grade.
- No longer only applicable to higher education costs, you may want to consider making these payments through a 529 plan to secure the PA tax deduction for these contributions and expenses. For example if you are making these payments anyway for your children or grandchildren and there are three of them, the $30,000 PA deduction will save you $921 in PA taxes!
TCJA also made notable changes to the following areas of tax law affecting Individuals:
- The Kiddie Tax has been modified, resulting in the net unearned income of children under the age of 19 (or full-time students under 24) being taxed according to the brackets applicable to trusts and estates.
- The Child Tax Credit has increased in 2018 to $2,000 per qualified child. The income thresholds for taking the credit have also substantially increased. More filers will qualify for this credit.
- The deduction for home mortgage interest is limited to underlying indebtedness of up to $750,000 beginning with purchases made on or after December 15, 2017. The interest deduction related to home equity indebtedness is suspended in 2018 unless used to make improvements to the home.
- Alimony is not deductible by the Payor spouse and is not included in the income of the Payee spouse for any divorce or separation agreement executed after December 31, 2018.
- Business/client meals are still limited by 50%. There is no longer an entertainment expense deduction, though employee Holiday parties are 100% deductible.
Though the focus of our memo thus far has been on year-end planning for Individual Income Tax, the TCJA has also resulted in substantial changes to tax law for business income and pass through income that is taxed on the individual return.
- Corporate tax rates have been drastically cut to 21% and corporate AMT is no longer applicable. (AMT will apply to substantially less individuals than it has in the past.)
- New tax law allows for enhanced bonus depreciation and Section 179 deductions.
- Bonus depreciation now currently allows for 100% expensing of both new and used acquisitions.
- Maximum deductions for Section 179 property has been increased to $1 million.
- The phase-out threshold has increased, and the definition of 179 property has expanded to include certain nonresidential real property improvements.
- The Section 199A deduction is a new and complex deduction intended for individuals and for pass-through entity income on the individual return. It could result in up to a 20% deduction on qualified business income.
- One consideration related to this deduction is the establishment of a retirement plan on your business income. Doing so will reduce your taxable income for the purposes of qualifying for the deduction while simultaneously helping you save for retirement.
- If you think this deduction may be applicable to you, we urge you to give us a call.
- Speaking of retirement plans, if you are eligible to fund one strongly consider that option AND be reminded that some plans, especially those with a 401( k) feature (like a Solo 401(k)) need to be established before December 31st.
We would be remiss if we did not remind you to revisit your estate plan. Some advisors are suggesting, if you are financially situated, you make significant gifts to your heirs before there is a change in Congress that might result in a decrease to the current estate tax exemption amount which is now at $11,180,000 each. If your will is over 5 years old it may need a review.
Please also look at the beneficiary designations on your life insurance policies and your retirement plans. If a prior beneficiary has left us and a new one is not named, the asset may be administered through your estate which is NOT usually the best tax or economic answer.
That’s it for now. These are challenging tax times. PLEASE contact us if you want to discuss or implement any of the items in this memo or if you have any questions that we can help with.
As always, we hope you find plentiful reasons to give thanks and that the happiness and peace of this season is abundant in your heart and home. Have a great Holiday Season and a happy and healthy 2019!
Thank you for being our friends and clients and allowing our firm to provide your tax and accounting needs.
Siana Carr O’Connor & Lynam, LLP
Please read about the various changes in payroll withholding and related tax filing requirments for 2019.
The following is a summary of the various changes in payroll withholding and related filing requirements for 2019. As always, contact us if you have any questions on these matters.
On December 22, 2017, the most significant overhaul of the tax code in over three decades was signed into law. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) impacts individuals through the introduction of new tax rates and brackets, increased standard deduction, changes to allowable itemized deductions, elimination of personal exemptions, plus many other changes.
Under the new law, various deductions and certain tax-favored fringe benefits have been eliminated or modified. These changes include the suspension of the deductions for moving expenses and certain qualified transportation expenses. The tax-free reimbursement of employment-related moving expenses has been suspended. The Act also suspends an employee's deduction for unreimbursed business expenses (previously deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction). For tax years 2018 and 2019, a credit for Paid Family and Medical Leave may apply to some larger employers who are subject to the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
The Act reduces the federal corporate (C-Corp) tax rate to 21%, while also providing a new deduction from pass-through income generated by most S-Corps, Partnerships, Sole Proprietors, etc. These provisions have many business owners reconsidering their current entity structure and evaluating the methods for paying themselves and their employees. Please note that the issues of reasonable compensation to owners, and the classification of workers as employees vs. independent contractors remain the focus of Internal Revenue Service scrutiny. Numerous other provisions exist which may impact your employees, you and/or your business, but a more in-depth analysis of the complete Act is beyond the scope of this newsletter focusing on employment taxes. Please contact our office should you desire a more in-depth explanation of this legislation.
A. FEDERAL TAX DEPOSITS
Most taxpayers are required to make federal tax deposits for payroll taxes, corporate income tax, and backup withhlding electronically through use of the electronic federal tax payment system. Paper coupons are discontinued as the paper coupon system is no longer maintained by the Treasury Department. The primary exemption is for employers that have $2,500 or less in quarterly payroll tax liability, who may pay this liability when filing the quarterly employment tax return.
Officers and/or employees of a corporation or partnership can become personally liable for failure to withhold and remit federal employment taxes. If you are using a payroll service to make your deposits, you should ensure that the payments are timely made. Penalties can equal the amount of the tax due (100% penalty). If you are having difficulty paying your employment taxes timely, please call us.
The net FUTA rate for most Pennsylvania and New Jersey employers is 0.6% for 2018. The 2019 net FUTA tax rates are likely to approximate the same. FUTA tax continues to be assessed on the first $7,000 of wages paid to each worker during a calendar year.
The Internal Revenue Service deadline for submitting government copies of 2018 Form W-2 to the Social Security Administration is January 31, 2019. This is the same as the deadline to furnish employees with their forms.
B. SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE TAXES
For 2019, the taxable social security wage base limit is $132,900. The employee and employer tax rate for social security is 6.2%. In 2019, all wages are taxable for the Medicare portion of the tax which is 1.45% for both employees and employers. The self-employment tax rate will be 15.3% on the first $132,900 of net earnings.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) imposes an additional 0.9% Medicare tax on wages, compensation, or self-employment income exceeding the threshold amount $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly, $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately, and $200,000 for other taxpayers. There is no corresponding amount owed by the employer. Employers must withhold Additional Medicare tax from wages it pays to an individual in excess of $200,000 in a calendar year. If individuals anticipate owing more Additional Medicare tax than the amount withheld, they should request additional income tax withholding using Form W-4 and/or should make estimated tax payments. Taxpayers will calculate Additional Medicare tax liabilities on their individual income tax returns (Form 1040), and will apply any Additional Medicare tax withheld against all taxes shown on this return.
C. PENNSYLVANIA PERSONAL INCOME TAXES
The withholding rate remains at 3.07%. The PA Dept. of Revenue no longer provides paper coupon booklets. Instead, employer returns and payments should be filed using three electronic options: Internet, Tele file or third-party software. If you have not yet registered under one of these methods, we encourage you to do so. If you want our help in using these filing methods, please call us. More information can be obtained via the internet at www.revenue.state.pa.us and www.etides.state.pa.us. Employers may still file using paper returns and checks, however, we recommend that you switch to the D.O.R. mandated methods.
D. PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
The first $10,000 of wages paid to each worker in calendar year 2019 is taxed at the employer’s standard rate, as provided by the State. In addition, employers are required to withhold unemployment taxes from employees’ gross wages at a rate of 0.06%. The amount of compensation subject to employee withholding is not limited. Pennsylvania employers are required to electronically file quarterly UC tax and wage reports through the Unemployment Compensation Management System (UCMS). The Department of Labor is no longer mailing paper UC-2 forms to employers. Additional information is available at www.dli.state.pa.us.
E. PENNSYLVANIA NEW ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENT
The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue recently changed the electronic filing requirement threshold for W-2 forms. Employers who file 10 or more W-2 forms with the Department are now required to file those forms electronically. The change is in effect for tax year 2018 filings. Employers should visit e-TIDES, the Department’s online system for business taxes, at www.etides.state.pa.us to file their Annual Withholding Reconciliation Statement (REV-1667). The REV-1667 must be filed by January 31. Copies of the Individual Wage Statement (W-2) must also be filed electronically with the form REV-1667.
Employers should know that the Department will grant a waiver for the 2018 tax filing season with regard to the electronic filing requirement. Additional information regarding the electronic filing requirement is available through the Department’s Business Taxes e-Services Center by accessing its website www.revenue.pa.gov or calling 717-787-7635.
F. PHILADELPHIA CITY WAGE TAX
Employers must withhold city wage taxes for residents at the rate of 3.8809% (.038809) and nonresidents who work in the city at the rate of 3.4567% (.034567). Every Pennsylvania employer who employs a Philadelphia resident must register with the Philadelphia City Revenue Commissioner and withhold the city wage tax. Please note that Philadelphia commonly changes these rates in July each year.
G. LOCAL PAYROLL TAXES
PA Act 32 - Local Earned Income Tax Law
The Pennsylvania law known as “Act 32” requires every business that employs individuals who work within Pennsylvania, either at a worksite or from their homes to withhold the applicable local earned income tax amount from employees’ wages and to remit this timely to the appropriate tax collection agency. The employer must withhold the greater of the employee’s resident tax rate for where they live or nonresident tax rate for where they work. Each employee must complete a Residency Certification Form, to identify the proper subdivision where they live and work. Additional information regarding Act 32 is available through the PA Department of Community and Economic Development by accessing its website www.newPA.com or calling 1-866-466-3972.
Philadelphia is not regulated by Act 32, so the present system administered by the Philadelphia Department of Revenue remains in effect.
Local Services Tax (LST)
The Local Services Tax (LST) allows local governments to levy a tax of $10 to $52 per employee per year. If the locality levies a tax of $10, then the employer should withhold the tax from the first paycheck of the employee unless the employee qualifies for an exemption. The LST exempts employees who make less than $12,000 annually from the tax. The LST also exempts disabled veterans and reservists who are called to active duty at any time during the year from the tax. The employer must obtain and retain exemption certificates from such employees to document the non-withholding exemption. The LST (if more than $10) is not collected at one time, but must be withheld pro rata during the year with each payroll.
H. NEW HIRE REPORTING
Federal regulation mandates all employers to report information about any new employee within 20 DAYS of their hire date. Penalties for noncompliance can be up to $500 per employee. Mandatory information to report for all Pennsylvania employers includes: employee’s name, address, social security number, date of birth and hire date, also employer’s name, address, federal identification number, contact and phone number. Employers may report their new hire information by either manual or electronic means. Multi state employers must report employees either by magnetic tape or electronically. Additional information can be obtained at www.cwds.pa.gov or call 1-888-PAHIRES.
I. RETIREMENT PLANS
- The limitation on the exclusion for elective deferrals under 401(k) and other plans is increased from $18,500 in 2018 to $19,000 in 2019. Taxpayers who are age 50 and older (during 2019) can make an additional catch-up contribution in the amount of $6,000 in 2019.
- 401(k) and 403(b) plans may offer qualified Roth contributions that allow employees to elect to make all or a portion of their 401(k) contributions on an after-tax basis. Similar to Roth IRA’s, earnings grow tax free and, in most circumstances, distributions are free from tax when withdrawn. Your plan documents must explicitly allow designated Roth contributions.
- The annual compensation limit taken into account for qualified plan purposes is increased from $275,000 in 2018 to $280,000 in 2019.
- The maximum annual amount of salary reduction contributions to a SIMPLE retirement plan is increased from $12,500 in 2018 to $13,000 in 2019. Taxpayers who are age 50 and older (during 2019) can make an additional contribution of $3,000 in 2019.
- The limitation on the annual benefit under a defined benefit plan is increased from $220,000 in 2018 to $225,000 in 2019. The limitation for defined contribution plans is increased from $55,000 in 2018 to $56,000 in 2019.
- The amount used to identify highly compensated employees for non-discrimination testing purposes is increased from $120,000 in 2018 to $125,000 in 2019.
J. MINIMUM WAGE RATE
The minimum wage rate for Pennsylvania remains at $7.25 per hour in 2019.
K. STANDARD MILEAGE RATES
The standard mileage rate for business automobile usage is 58 cents per mile in 2019. The optional mileage allowance deduction may be used for both leased and purchased autos. If you elect the standard mileage rate for a leased auto, that method must be used for the entire lease period of that auto.
L. NON-CASH FRINGE BENEFITS
As noted above, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act modifies or eliminates the tax-favored treatment of certain fringe benefits such as moving expenses. The rules regarding the taxation and reporting of other fringe benefits still apply. Taxable fringe benefits include the following: the cost of nondiscriminatory group-term life insurance provided to employees in excess of $50,000; personal use of an employer provided vehicle; the cost of life insurance (other than group-term) provided to employees where the employee may determine the beneficiary; and discriminatory payments to key employees under educational assistance plans, self-insured medical reimbursement plans, dependent care assistance programs and group legal service plans.
M. 1099 REQUIREMENTS
Form 1099-MISC must be issued to persons and unincorporated entities (including partnerships and LLCs not taxed as corporations) receiving at least $600 for: 1) services rendered other than as an employee; 2) rent; 3) prizes; 4) medical and health care payments; or 5) other payments. Form 1099-MISC is not required to be filed for payments for merchandise, payments made via credit card, nor most payments to corporations, subject to some exceptions. You must also file Form 1099-MISC for each person from whom you have withheld any federal income tax under the backup withholding rules regardless of the amount of payment. Form 1099-INT should be filed to report interest payments of at least $10.
The filing deadline for Form 1099-MISC to report non-employee compensation in Box 7 and the related Form 1096 is January 31, 2019. For all other reported payments, file Form 1099 by February 28, 2019. The forms generally should be provided to recipients by January 31, 2019. Penalties for late filing, non-filing, or filing incorrect information range from $50 per information return to the greater of $540 or 10% of the aggregate dollar amount of the items required to be reported correctly. In certain instances, these penalties may be higher. Should you require our assistance in preparing these forms, please submit all information to us as soon as possible to allow for timely filing and to avoid the assessment of significant penalties. We recommend that you collect names, addresses and taxpayer identification numbers for every payee and vendor with whom you transact business. Forms W-9 should be used for this purpose and may be obtained via the internet at www.irs.gov or from our website.
Companies paying non-employee compensation for Pennsylvania based work must submit copies of federal forms 1099-MISC to the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue at the same time they are due to the Internal Revenue Service. Beginning January 1, 2018, payors of $5,000 or more for Pennsylvania-sourced work to nonresident individuals or to disregarded entities owned by nonresident individuals are required to withhold Pennsylvania personal income tax from such payments at a rate of 3.07%. Similarly, a business making rent or royalty payments exceeding $5,000 to nonresidents with regard to Pennsylvania property is required to withhold Pennsylvania personal income tax on such payments. These new withholding rules require electronically filed copies of IRS Form 1099-MISC with the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, as well as quarterly withholding returns and annual reconciliations.
The issue of whether workers should be classified as employees or as independent contractors remains the focus of Internal Revenue Service scrutiny. In determining appropriate worker classification, businesses must weigh a variety of factors. Some will dictate in favor of employee status while others will be indicative of independent contractor status. No single factor establishes the outcome, and all must be carefully considered within the context of the relationship. Improper reporting of workers can result in a requirement to pay back taxes plus interest and punitive penalties. Additional guidance with regard to this complex and important determination may be found at www.irs.gov (search “worker classification”). Should you have any questions, please call us.
N. HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENT
The maximum salary reduction contribution to a health flexible spending arrangement (health FSA) is $2,700 for 2019. Any salary reductions in excess of this amount will be subject to tax on distributions from the health FSA.
O. THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (ACA)
Beginning in 2019, the TCJA eliminates the individual mandate imposing a penalty on those individuals failing to have health insurance coverage required under ACA; however, other provisions of the ACA are still in effect. Generally, ACA requires employers with at least 100 full-time equivalent employees (FTE) to provide health coverage, or risk paying a penalty. ACA also requires employers and insurers to report certain information to the Internal Revenue Service.
In addition, ACA requires certain employers to report on Form W-2 the aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored health coverage paid during the calendar year. The aggregate reportable cost is reported on Form W-2 in Box 12, using Code DD. Pending further guidance from the IRS, transition relief of this disclosure requirement may apply to certain small employers who issue less than 250 W-2 Forms each year. A detailed analysis for implementing these provisions is beyond the scope of this newsletter, but please contact us if further guidance is needed in regard to the Affordable Care Act.
P. EMPLOYEE BUSINESS EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS
If an employee is reimbursed for business expenses under an “accountable plan”, the reimbursements are not treated as taxable income to the employee. An accountable plan must require the employee to: 1) substantiate the nature and amount of the expenses, and 2) repay to the employer any reimbursements in excess of the business expenses incurred. Please contact us if you need assistance in designing an accountable plan.
Q. ANNUAL LEASE VALUE AMOUNTS FOR PERSONAL USE OF COMPANY CARS
The “Annual Lease Value” (ALV) table, as issued by the Internal Revenue Service (www.irs.gov), shows the annual value to employees for the personal use of a company car. This ALV amount of the auto is includible in the employee’s income, unless the car is used exclusively for business purposes. If the car is used partly for personal driving, a percentage of the ALV (based on the percentage of personal use) is reported on the employee’s W-2. Note that the ALV does not change each year. Instead, it is treated as constant for each of the first four years of use. If the company car is still in use after four years, it is revalued at the beginning of the fifth year, and the ALV based on this new fair market value is used for the next four years of employee use. The ALV includes the value of auto insurance, registration fees and repairs paid by the company. It does not include the cost of fuel. If the company pays for fuel, the cost consumed in personal driving is additional W-2 income to the employee. A standard rate of 5½ cents per mile may be used in computing income attributable to personal fuel costs paid by the employer.
R. PROPOSED OVERTIME REGULATIONS HALTED BY FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT
In 2016, the Department of Labor issued revised overtime rules under the Fair Labor Standards Act. These changes were scheduled to go into effect on December 1, 2016 but have since been halted by subsequent litigation. We recommend that employers remain informed as to the status of this matter.
DISCLOSURE
The above synopses are brief reviews of general payroll tax issues. They are not intended to be complete explanations or to provide tax advice for specific fact patterns. Please discuss any decision concerning specific situations with a tax advisor qualified on such issues.
"A thumb goes up, a car goes by…" Tax extenders remain a top contender for "hitching a ride" on November’s must-pass government funding bill.
"A thumb goes up, a car goes by…" Tax extenders remain a top contender for "hitching a ride" on November’s must-pass government funding bill.
Wolters Kluwer recently sat down with Jennifer Acuña, Principal, Federal Legislative and Regulatory Services, KPMG LLP, in Washington, D.C. to discuss over 30 temporary tax provisions known as "tax extenders," which have expired or will soon expire spanning from 2017 to 2019. Before joining KPMG, Acuña served as chief tax counsel for the Senate Finance Committee (SFC), and was previously tax counsel for the House Ways and Means Committee.
New Tax Extenders Climate on Capitol Hill
"There is an interesting dynamic going on with tax extenders on Capitol Hill. In the past, extenders were viewed as a priority item, and that has changed," Acuña said.
Generally, tax extenders have been viewed on Capitol Hill as a consistently bipartisan annual or biannual year-end legislative initiative. However, the fate of tax extenders is more uncertain than it has been in the past – in part because it is not clear yet whether there will be an opportunity for any further tax legislation to become law this year, Acuña observed.
Funding Bill Likely Driver for Tax Package
Lawmakers are revving up negotiations as Congress races against this year’s dwindling legislative calendar to reach an agreement on fiscal year (FY) 2020 appropriations. Government funding is scheduled to expire on November 21.
Given the political climate on Capitol Hill and Congress’s limited time left on the legislative calendar, a stand-alone tax package is considered unlikely to make its way through both chambers successfully. That said, November’s "must-pass" government funding bill could be the legislative vehicle for dozens of expired or soon-to-be expired tax extenders, as well as for any other tax provisions that may crop up during lawmakers’ negotiations.
SFC Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., introduced their bipartisan Tax Extenders and Disaster Relief bill (Sen. 617) earlier this year. Subsequently, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., introduced his version of a similarly named tax extenders bill (HR 3301). However, Neal’s bill—which proposes undoing certain provisions related to estate taxes under 2017 tax reform as a "pay for"—was immediately deemed a nonstarter by Senate Republicans.
Notably, Acuña observed that House Democrats may be viewing their tax extenders bill as an opening offer, providing leverage for a larger tax policy negotiation. "In today’s climate it seems that some of the signaling that’s taking place is that House Democrats are trying to position tax extenders as a Republican priority to build up leverage for a larger tax policy negotiation," Acuña said. "Once you have a tax title on a big bill, there is no limit as to which tax provisions could actually be included in the bill," she added.
Larger Tax Package Could Emerge
In that vein, there has been talk among lawmakers that a larger, catch-all tax package could emerge from these negotiations. Any tax package that is unveiled in the coming weeks must have significant bipartisan support to make it to the president’s desk. That said, amidst the new climate surrounding tax extenders on Capitol Hill. several lawmakers have alluded that bipartisan negotiations could result in any number of tax provisions being added to the anticipated tax package, including technical corrections to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97).
Staking Ground on Extenders
"Right now, what is happening is that parties are staking their ground," Acuña said. While Neal’s bill was largely seen on Capitol Hill as an opening bid to these negotiations, "no one opens with their best offer," Acuña said. However, "there is common ground with respect to tax extenders," she added.
Additionally, Acuña noted that these temporary tax provisions benefit a broad range of constituents. "They have been extended historically without fail for a reason. And it is because there has typically been general bipartisan support for extenders; there is a little bit of something for everyone" she said.
However, as for which tax extenders will be renewed this year, as well as retroactively or all together forgotten, Grassley recently indicated that all eligible provisions will likely make the cut. "I would expect that as of right now, if there is an extenders package there won’t be anything left out," Grassley told reporters.
When asked if Grassley was likely referring to all expired or soon-to-be expired tax incentives spanning from 2017 to 2019, Acuña told Wolters Kluwer "that would seem to be the case." While discussing the possibility of yet another temporary extension, Acuña noted that it is hard to make policy calls on a temporary tax extenders package.
"If you want a drama free negotiation on temporary extensions, it’s a clean date change. It is easier – you do not have a policy debate," she said. "If there is an opportunity for a tax title to be attached to a larger bill this year, it is infinitely harder to include changes that some Members of Congress will not like than it is to just do what has been done in the past and kick the can down the road by temporarily extending everything."
In looking ahead, deciding which temporary tax provisions get the axe is a policy call that is unlikely to be made this year and will not easily be done on a bipartisan basis, according to Acuña.
To Pay For or Not to Pay For
As for tax extenders’ cost, the issue of pay-fors has not generally been a longwinded discussion among lawmakers. "In the past, there have been very short-lived debates on whether to pay for them," Acuña said, adding that extenders generally have not been paid for. "It is hard to find a way to raise the kind of money needed to pay for a tax extenders bill that would be politically palatable for both sides of the aisle."
However, cost can be a leading issue when Congress creates these tax breaks on a temporary rather than permanent basis, Acuña explained. "In theory, everyone might agree that a tax incentive is excellent tax policy, but because of revenue constraints, Congress will not or cannot pay for it on a permanent basis—and that is usually where Congress lands in this temporary tax policy pickle."
Additionally, Acuna highlighted that many of the individual tax cuts under the TCJA were enacted temporarily through 2025 due to budgetary reasons. "A lot of the TCJA provisions gave life to new expiring provisions," Acuña noted. Likening the TCJA’s individual provisions to the long list of tax extenders currently awaiting possible renewal, Acuña noted that tax policy is not usually made temporary "because the members viewed the underlying tax policy as unsound but because of other constraints."
The End for Tax Extenders?
Many Republican and Democratic lawmakers’ have called for an end to tax extenders, citing to the annual year-end dash to renew temporary tax provisions as bad tax policy overall. Indeed, five taskforces comprised of bipartisan SFC members recently reviewed these tax extenders and largely agreed that temporary tax policy in general is less than ideal. While many House lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, in this Congress and those before it, have agreed that enacting permanent tax invectives is better policy than doing so temporarily, actually getting there remains a challenge, even if just procedurally.
The IRS has issued a revenue procedure with a safe harbor that allows certain interests in rental real estate to be treated as a trade or business for purposes of the Code Sec. 199A qualified business income (QBI) deduction. The safe harbor is intended to lessen taxpayer uncertainty on whether a rental real estate interest qualifies as a trade or business for the QBI deduction, including the application of the aggregation rules in Reg. §1.199A-4.
The IRS has issued a revenue procedure with a safe harbor that allows certain interests in rental real estate to be treated as a trade or business for purposes of the Code Sec. 199A qualified business income (QBI) deduction. The safe harbor is intended to lessen taxpayer uncertainty on whether a rental real estate interest qualifies as a trade or business for the QBI deduction, including the application of the aggregation rules in Reg. §1.199A-4.
QBI Deduction and Rental Real Estate
Under Code Sec. 199A, certain noncorporate taxpayers can deduct up to 20 percent of the taxpayer’s QBI from each of the taxpayer's qualified trades or businesses, including those operated through a partnership, S corporation, or sole proprietorship. Certain relevant passthrough entities (RPEs) (partnerships, S corporations, trust funds) calculate the deduction and pass it along to their owners or beneficiaries. A qualified trade or business is generally any trade or business under Code Sec. 162, but not a specified service trade or business (SSTB) or a trade or business of performing services as an employee.
Rental or licensing of tangible or intangible property (i.e., rental activity) that is not a Code Sec. 162 trade or business is still treated as a trade or business for the QBI deduction if the property is rented or licensed to a trade or business conducted by the individual or a RPE which is commonly controlled under Reg. §1.199A-4 ( Reg. §1.199A-1(b)(14)).
Earlier this year, the IRS released a proposed revenue procedure with a safe harbor for treating a rental real estate enterprise as a trade or business under Code Sec. 199A ( Notice 2019-7, I.R.B. 2019-9, 740). The IRS has issued the new revenue procedure after considering public comments on Notice 2019-7.
Rental Real Estate Enterprise
The new safe harbor applies to a "rental real estate enterprise." This is an interest in real property held for the production of rents, and may consist of an interest in a single property or interests in multiple properties. The taxpayer or RPE must hold each interest directly or through a disregarded entity, and may either:
- treat each interest in similar property held for the production of rents as a separate rental real estate enterprise; or
- treat interests in all similar properties held for the production of rents as a single rental real estate enterprise.
Properties are similar if they are part of the same rental real estate category: either residential or commercial. Commercial real estate held for the production of rents can only be part of the same enterprise with other commercial real estate. Residential properties can only be part of the same enterprise with other residential properties.
A taxpayer or RPE that treats interests in similar properties as a single rental real estate enterprise must continue to treat interests in all similar properties, including newly acquired properties, as a single rental real estate enterprise if it continues to rely on the safe harbor. However, a taxpayer or RPE that chooses to treat its interest in each residential or commercial property as a separate rental real estate enterprise can choose to treat its interests in all similar commercial or all similar residential properties as a single rental real estate enterprise in a future year.
An interest in mixed-use property—a single building that combines residential and commercial units—can be treated as a single rental real estate enterprise, or bifurcated into separate residential and commercial interests. A mixed-use property interest that is treated as a single rental real estate enterprise cannot be treated as part of the same enterprise as other residential, commercial, or mixed-use property.
Safe Harbor Requirements
The safe harbor determination must be made annually. For a rental real estate enterprise to qualify for the safe harbor, all of the following requirements must be met during the tax year:
- Separate books and records are maintained to reflect income and expenses for each rental real estate enterprise. If an enterprise has more than one property, the requirement can be met if income and expense information statements for each property are maintained and then consolidated.
- For rental real estate enterprises in existence for less than four years, 250 or more hours of rental services are performed per year. For rental real estate enterprises in existence for at least four years, 250 or more hours of rental services are performed per year in any three of the five consecutive tax years that end with the tax year.
- The taxpayer maintains contemporaneous records (including time reports, logs, or similar documents) on the hours of all services performed, a description of all services performed, the dates when the services were performed, and who performed the services. For services performed by employees or independent contractors, the taxpayer may provide a description of the rental services, the amount of time generally spent performing the services, and the time, wage, or payment records for the employee or independent contractor. Records must be made available for inspection at the IRS's request. (The contemporaneous records requirement does not apply to tax years that begin before January 1, 2020.)
- For each tax year for which it relies on the safe harbor, the taxpayer or RPE must attach a statement to a timely filed original return (or an amended return for the 2018 tax year only) that includes: (i) a description (including the address and rental category) of all rental real estate properties in each rental real estate enterprise; (ii) a description (including the address and rental category) of rental real estate properties acquired and disposed of during the tax year; and (iii) a representation that the requirements of Rev. Proc. 2019-38 have been satisfied.
"Rental services" include, but are not limited to:
- advertising to rent or lease the real estate;
- negotiating and executing leases;
- verifying information contained in prospective tenant applications;
- collecting rent;
- daily operation, maintenance, and repair of the property, including purchasing materials and
- supplies;
- managing the real estate; and
- supervising employees and independent contractors.
Rental services does not include:
- financial or investment management activities, such as arranging financing;
- procuring property;
- studying and reviewing financial statements or reports on operations;
- improving property under Reg. §1.263(a)-3(d); or
- time spent traveling to and from the real estate.
If an enterprise fails to satisfy the safe harbor requirements, it can still be treated as a trade or business for the QBI deduction if it otherwise meets the trade or business definition in Reg. §1.199A-1(b)(14).
Property Excluded From Safe Harbor
The safe harbor does not apply to:
- real estate used by the taxpayer (including an owner or beneficiary of an RPE) as a residence under Code Sec. 280A(d);
- real estate rented or leased under a triple net lease, which includes a lease agreement that requires the tenant or lessee to pay taxes, fees, and insurance, and to pay for maintenance activities for a property in addition to rent and utilities;
- real estate rented to a trade or business conducted by a taxpayer or an RPE that is commonly controlled under Reg. §1.199A-4(b)(1)(i); or
- the entire rental real estate interest, if any portion of it is treated as an SSTB under Reg. §1.199A-5(c)(2).
Effective Date
The safe harbor applies to tax years ending after December 31, 2017. However, taxpayers and RPEs can rely on the prior safe harbor in Notice 2019-7 for the 2018 tax year.
The IRS has released cryptocurrency guidance and frequently asked questions (FAQs) on virtual currency.
The IRS has released cryptocurrency guidance and frequently asked questions (FAQs) on virtual currency. Under the cryptocurrency guidance:
- a taxpayer does not have gross income from a "hard fork" of the taxpayer's cryptocurrency if the taxpayer does not receive units of a new cryptocurrency; and
- a taxpayer has ordinary income as a result of an "airdrop" of a new cryptocurrency following a hard fork if the taxpayer receives units of the new cryptocurrency.
The IRS has posted the FAQs on its website ( https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/frequently-asked-questions-on-virtual-currency-transactions).
Virtual Currency and Cryptocurrency
Virtual currency is a digital representation of value that functions as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and a store of value other than a representation of the U.S. dollar or a foreign currency.
Cryptocurrency is a type of virtual currency that uses cryptography to secure transactions that are digitally recorded on a distributed ledger, such as a blockchain. Distributed ledger technology uses independent digital systems to record, share, and synchronize transactions, the details of which are recorded in multiple places at the same time with no central data store or administration functionality.
Hard Forks and Air Drops
A hard fork occurs when a cryptocurrency on a distributed ledger undergoes a protocol change resulting in a permanent diversion from the legacy or existing distributed ledger. A hard fork may result in the creation of a new cryptocurrency on a new distributed ledger in addition to the legacy cryptocurrency on the legacy distributed ledger. Following a hard fork, transactions involving the new cryptocurrency are recorded on the new distributed ledger, and transactions involving the legacy cryptocurrency continue to be recorded on the legacy distributed ledger.
An airdrop is a means of distributing units of a cryptocurrency to the distributed ledger addresses of multiple taxpayers. A hard fork followed by an airdrop results in the distribution of units of the new cryptocurrency to addresses containing the legacy cryptocurrency. Note, however, that a hard fork is not always followed by an airdrop.
Cryptocurrency from an airdrop generally is received on the date and at the time it is recorded on the distributed ledger. However, a taxpayer may constructively receive cryptocurrency prior to the airdrop being recorded on the distributed ledger. A taxpayer does not have receipt of cryptocurrency when the airdrop is recorded on the distributed ledger if the taxpayer is not able to exercise dominion and control over the cryptocurrency.
Gross Income
If the taxpayer did not receive units of new cryptocurrency from a hard fork, the taxpayer does not have an accession to wealth and does not have gross income as a result of the hard fork.
If the taxpayer receives units of new cryptocurrency from an airdrop following a hard fork, the taxpayer received a new asset. Therefore, the taxpayer has an accession to wealth and has ordinary income in the year in which the taxpayer receives the new cryptocurrency. The taxpayer includes in gross income the fair market value of the cryptocurrency received. The taxpayer’s basis in the new cryptocurrency is the amount of income recognized.
Schedule 1, Form 1040 for 2019
A draft of the 2019 Form 1040, Schedule 1, "Additional Income and Adjustments to Income," includes a question which asks: "At any time during 2019, did you receive, sell, send, exchange or otherwise acquire any financial interest in any virtual currency?" If an individual has engaged in any virtual currency transaction in 2019, he or she must check the “Yes” box next to the question.
If the taxpayer has disposed of any virtual currency that was held as a capital asset, he or she must use Form 8949 to figure the capital gain or loss and report it on Schedule D (Form 1040 or Form 1040-SR). If the taxpayer has received any virtual currency as compensation for services, or disposed of any virtual currency that he or she held for sale to customers in a trade or business, the taxpayer must report the income as he or she would report other income of the same type.
A district court has dismissed a lawsuit filed by four states’ against the federal government, ruling that the $10,000 state and local taxes (SALT) federal deduction cap is not unconstitutionally coercive.
A district court has dismissed a lawsuit filed by four states’ against the federal government, ruling that the $10,000 state and local taxes (SALT) federal deduction cap is not unconstitutionally coercive.
In 2018, New York, Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey filed suit against the IRS and Treasury alleging that the SALT cap violates the federalism principles that undergird the U.S. Constitution. Judge J. Paul Oetken of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled on September 30 that the SALT cap is not an unconstitutional infringement of state power.
The states’ primary concern stemmed from the claim that the introduction of the SALT cap could impair each of the states’ ability to pursue its own preferred tax policies. However, the court noted that Congress lawfully enacted the SALT cap pursuant to its broad tax powers under Article I, section 8 and the Sixteenth Amendment, and that the cap, like any federal tax provision, will affect some taxpayers more than others and, by extension, will affect some states more than others. However, the cap, like every other feature of the federal tax code, is a part of the landscape of federal law with which states make their decisions as to how they will exercise their own sovereign tax powers, according to Oetken. Because the states failed to plausibly allege that the cap, more so than any other major federal initiative, meaningfully constrains this decision-making process, the district court had no basis for concluding that the SALT cap is unconstitutionally coercive.
Background
In 2017, President Trump signed into law sweeping tax reform legislation informally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), which made several substantial amendments to the federal tax code. Among other things, the TCJA placed an upper limit of $10,000 on the amount a taxpayer may deduct from their federal tax income to offset those sums they have paid toward certain state and local taxes (the "SALT cap"). As enacted, the SALT cap is scheduled to expire at the end of 2025.
Democrats on Capitol Hill Prepare to Move SALT Cap Repeal Bill
Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill are preparing to move a SALT cap repeal bill when Congress returns from its two-week recess. Specifically, Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J. has proposed repealing the SALT cap and raising the top income tax rate from 37 percent to 39.6 percent, where it previously sat. Additionally, Pascrell recently told reporters that House Democrats will likely propose a temporary repeal of the SALT cap as a "compromise."
At this time, however, any Democratic-backed measure to repeal or scale back the SALT cap is expected to fail in the Republican-controlled Senate.
New final regulations that address the allocation of partnership liabilities for disguised sale purposes revert back to prior regulations. Under the final regulations:
New final regulations that address the allocation of partnership liabilities for disguised sale purposes revert back to prior regulations. Under the final regulations:
- a partner’s share of a recourse liability of the partnership equals the partner’s share of the liability under the rules of Code Sec. 752 and the related regulations; and
- a partner’s share of a nonrecourse liability of the partnership is determined by applying the same percentage used to determine the partner’s share of the excess nonrecourse liability under Reg. §1.752-3(a)(3) ( Reg. §1.707-5(a)(2)).
Executive Order Triggers Reversion Back to Prior Disguised Sale Rules
In October 2016, the IRS issued final and temporary regulations (707 Temporary Regulations) under which a partnership would determine all partnership liabilities for disguised sales purposes—both recourse and nonrecourse—by applying the same percentage used to determine a partner’s share of excess nonrecourse liability under Reg. §1.752-3(a)(3) ( T.D. 9788).
In April 2017, the President issued Executive Order 13789 (E.O. 13789) on reducing tax regulatory burdens. In response, the IRS identified the final and temporary regulations in T.D. 9788 as implicating some of those regulatory burdens. In turn, in 2018 Proposed Regulations, the IRS proposed to withdraw the 707 Temporary Regulations and reinstate the regulations under Reg. §1.707-5(a)(2) described above. Now, the IRS has adopted the 2018 Proposed Regulations, thereby reinstating the Prior 707 rules.
Treasury and the IRS will continue to study the merits of the approach in the 707 Temporary Regulations and other approaches, including the final regulations, to determine which results in the most appropriate treatment of liabilities in the context of disguised sales.
Effective Dates
The final regulations apply to any transaction with respect to which all transfers occur on or after October 4, 2019, the date that the 707 Temporary Regulations expire. However, partnerships and their partners may apply the final regulations to any transaction where all transfers occur on or after January 3, 2017, the applicable date of the 707 Temporary Regulations.
The IRS has released final regulation on the election to take a loss resulting from a federally declared disaster in the year preceding the disaster. The final regulations adopt proposed regulations substantially without change.
The IRS has released final regulation on the election to take a loss resulting from a federally declared disaster in the year preceding the disaster. The final regulations adopt proposed regulations substantially without change.
Disaster Defined
The regulations provide definitions of:
- federally declared disaster;
- federally declared disaster area;
- disaster loss;
- disaster year; and
- preceding year.
Scope and Effect of Election
The election for a disaster loss attributable to a particular disaster applies to the entire loss sustained by the taxpayer from that disaster during the disaster year.
Making or Revoking Election
A taxpayer elects to deduct a disaster loss for the preceding year on:
- an original federal income tax return for the preceding year; or
- an amended federal income tax return for the preceding year.
The election is made in the manner specified by guidance issued pursuant to the regulations.
A taxpayer may not to take a disaster loss in the preceding year if the taxpayer claims a deduction (as a loss, as cost of goods sold, or otherwise) for the same loss for the disaster year.
If a taxpayer has claimed a deduction for a disaster loss for the disaster year and wants to elect the loss for the preceding year, the taxpayer must file an amended federal income tax return to remove the previously deducted loss on or before the date that the taxpayer makes the election for the preceding year loss.
If a taxpayer has claimed a deduction for a disaster loss for the preceding year and wants to revoke that election, the taxpayer must file an amended federal income tax return to remove the loss for the preceding year on or before the date the taxpayer files the federal income tax return or the amended federal income tax return for the disaster year that includes the loss.
Due Dates
The due date for making the election to deduct a disaster loss in the preceding year is six months after the due date for filing the taxpayer's federal income tax return for the disaster year (determined without regard to any extension of time to file).
Subject to the final regulation requirements, a taxpayer may revoke the election on or before the date that is 90 days after the due date for making the election.
Applicability Date
The final regulations apply to elections and revocations that are made on or after the date they are published in the Federal Register.
Proposed regulations provide guidance on the potential tax consequences of replacing the London interbank offered rates (LIBORs) with a new reference rate in contracts and agreements.
Proposed regulations provide guidance on the potential tax consequences of replacing the London interbank offered rates (LIBORs) with a new reference rate in contracts and agreements.
On July 27, 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that all currency and term variants of the LIBORs may be phased out after 2021. On March 5, 2018, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) established that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) would replace the LIBOR within the United States.
Tax Implications
Because the LIBORs are being phased out, existing debt instruments and derivatives must be amended. Parties will either amend debt instruments or contracts to replace references to the LIBOR with the SOFR (if in the United States). Alternatively, parties may alter debt instruments or contracts to replace the LIBOR-referencing fallback rate with another fallback rate upon the cessation of the LIBOR.
The ARRC has expressed several concerns to the IRS about the potential tax consequences associated with these contract amendments:
- Modification of Terms of Debt and Non-Debt Instruments. Currently, there are no regulations under Code Sec. 1001 that address when a modification of a debt instrument, derivative, or other non-debt contract creates a realization event.
- Transactions and Hedges. Amending the LIBOR-referencing debt instrument or hedge may cause a deemed termination of the hedge, which could lead to undesirable tax consequences.
- Character of a One-Time Payment. Parties may need to agree to a one-time payment to address any differences between the LIBOR and the new rate, and it is unclear what the character of this payment would be.
- Grandfathered Agreements. Certain debt and non-debt instruments that are exempt from specific laws due to their grandfathered status may lose that status if they are modified to reflect the elimination of the LIBOR.
- OID and Qualified Floating Rates. The transition from the LIBOR to the SOFR (or other alternative rates) raises potential issues under the original issue discount (OID) rules.
- REMICs. The modification of the terms of the regular interest rate in a real estate mortgage investment conduit (REMIC) to deal with the elimination of the LIBOR could preclude the interest from being a regular interest.
- Interest in Foreign Corporations. The elimination of the LIBOR could prevent a foreign bank from taking advantage of the election under Reg. §1.882-5(d)(5)(ii)(B).
Modification of Debt Instruments, Non-Debt Contracts
Under Proposed Reg. §1.1001-6(a), if the terms of a debt instrument or non-debt contract are modified to replace, or to provide a fallback to, an LIBOR-referencing rate and the modification does not change the fair market value, there is no gain or loss under Code Sec. 1001. These rules apply regardless of whether the modification occurs by an amendment to the terms of the instrument or agreement or by replacing the existing debt instrument or contract with a new one.
Furthermore, altering the debt instrument’s terms to replace the LIBOR with a qualified rate is not treated as a modification and does not result in a deemed exchange of the debt instrument under Reg. §1001-3. Likewise, an alteration to a debt instrument’s terms to include a qualified rate (see below) as a fallback to an LIBOR referencing rate is not treated as a modification and therefore does not result in an exchange of the debt instrument for purposes of Reg. §1.1001-3.
Qualified Rate
Proposed Reg. §1.1001-6(b) provides the rules for determining whether a rate is a qualified rate. To be a qualified rate, Proposed Reg. §1.1001-6(b)(2)(i) requires that the fair market value of the debt instrument or non-debt contract after the modifications must be substantially equivalent to the fair market value before that alteration or modification. The proposed regulations provide that the fair market value of a debt instrument or derivative may be determined by any reasonable valuation method, as long as that method is applied consistently and takes into account any one-time payment made in lieu of a spread adjustment.
The proposed regulations provide two safe harbors to address the fair market value requirements. The debt instrument or non-debt contract are considered equivalent in value after the modification if:
- at the time of the modification, the historic average of the LIBOR-referencing rate is within 25 basis points of the historic average of the rate that replaces it; or
- the parties to the debt instrument or non-debt contract are not related and, through bona fide, arm’s length negotiations, determine that the fair market value of modified instrument or contract is substantially equivalent to the fair market value prior to the modification.
Transactions and Hedges
Proposed Reg. §1.1001-6(c) clarifies that a taxpayer can alter the terms of a debt instrument or modify one or more of the other components of an integrated or hedged transaction to replace a rate referencing an IBOR with a qualified rate without affecting the tax treatment of either the underlying transaction or the hedge. However, the integrated or hedged transaction as modified must continue to qualify for integration.
One-Time Payment
Under Proposed Reg. §1.1001-6(d), the source and character of a one-time payment that is made in connection with a modification described above will be the same as the source and character that would otherwise apply to a payment made by a payor with respect to the debt instrument or non-debt contract that is altered or modified.
Grandfathered Agreements
Because Proposed Reg. §1.1001-6(a) prevents debt instruments and non-debt contracts from being treated as reissued following a deemed exchange under Code Sec. 1001, the debt instrument or contract would not lose its grandfathered status as a result of any modifications made in connection with the elimination of an LIBOR.
OID and Qualified Floating Rate
Proposed Reg. §1.1275-2(m) stipulates three special rules for determining the amount and accrual of OID in the case of a variable rate debt instrument that provides both for interest at an LIBOR-referencing qualified floating rate and for a fallback rate that is triggered when the LIBOR becomes unavailable or unreliable.
- The LIBOR-referencing qualified floating rate and the fallback rate are treated as a single qualified floating rate for purposes of Reg. §1.1275-5.
- The possibility that the relevant LIBOR will become unavailable or unreliable is treated as a remote contingency for purposes of Reg. §1.1275-2(h).
- Occurrence of the event that triggers activation of the fallback rate is not treated as a change in circumstances.
REMIC Interests
Proposed Reg. §1.860G-1(e) permits an interest in a REMIC to retain its status as a regular interest despite certain alterations and contingencies.
Foreign Corporation Interests
The proposed regulations amend the election in Reg. §1.882-5(d)(5)(ii)(B) to allow a foreign corporation that is a bank to compute interest expense attributable to excess U.S.-connected liabilities using a yearly average SOFR in addition to the 30-day LIBOR. This amendment would allow the foreign corporation bank to make the election even after the LIBOR is phased out.
Applicability Date
The proposed regulations will apply to an alteration of the terms of a debt instrument or a modification to the terms of a non-debt contract that occurs on or after the date of publication of a Treasury Decision adopting those rules as final regulations in the Federal Register. A taxpayer may choose to apply the proposed regulations to alterations and modifications that occur before the regulations are finalized.
